Zero‐sum beliefs shape advantaged allies' support for collective action. (8th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stefaniak, Anna; Mallett, Robyn K.; Wohl, Michael J. A.
• Is Part Of: European journal of social psychology. Volume 50:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1259
• Page End: 1275
• Publication Date: 2020-06-08
• Subjects: allies -- collective action -- intergroup attitudes -- racial demographic shift -- zero‐sum beliefs; Social psychology -- Periodicals; 302
• DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2674
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0046-2772

Abstract

Abstract: Three studies ( N 1 = 1, 019; N 2 = 312; N 3 = 494) tested whether seeing intergroup relations as inherently antagonistic shaped advantaged social groups' allyship intentions. More specifically, we tested whether endorsing zero‐sum beliefs related to their willingness to support system‐challenging and system‐supporting collective action. Zero‐sum beliefs were negatively correlated with system‐challenging and positively correlated with system‐supporting collective action intentions. Zero‐sum beliefs were more common among advantaged than disadvantaged groups and translated into lower allyship intentions. Advantaged group members with higher levels of zero‐sum beliefs were also more likely to experience anger and fear when considering the demographic racial shift in the United States. Increased fear was associated with greater support for system‐supporting and lower support for system‐challenging collective action. We find consistent evidence that advantaged group members see intergroup relations as a zero‐sum game and that these beliefs are negatively related to their intentions to become allies.