A European proficiency test on thin‐film tandem photovoltaic devices. (10th September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A European proficiency test on thin‐film tandem photovoltaic devices. (10th September 2020)
- Main Title:
- A European proficiency test on thin‐film tandem photovoltaic devices
- Authors:
- Salis, Elena
Gerber, Andreas
Andreasen, Jens Wenzel
Gevorgyan, Suren A.
Betts, Tom
Mihaylov, Blagovest
Gottschalg, Ralph
Kodolbaş, Alp Osman
Yilmaz, Okan
Leidl, Roman
Rennhofer, Marcus
Zamini, Shokufeh
Acciarri, Maurizio
Binetti, Simona
Lotter, Erwin
Bakker, Klaas
Kroon, Jan
Soppe, Wim
Razongles, Guillaume
Mercaldo, Lucia V.
Roca, Francesco
Romano, Antonio
Hohl‐Ebinger, Jochen
Warta, Wilhelm
Balenzategui, José L.
Trigo, Juan F.
Neubert, Sebastian
Pavanello, Diego
Müllejans, Harald
Lauermann, Iver - Abstract:
- Abstract: A round‐robin proficiency test (RR PT) on thin‐film multi‐junction (MJ) photovoltaic (PV) cells was run between 13 laboratories within the European project CHEETAH. Five encapsulated PV cells were circulated to participants for being tested at Standard Test Conditions (STC). Three cells were a‐Si/μc‐Si tandem PV devices, each of which had a different short‐circuit current ratio between the top junction and the bottom one; the remaining two cells were single‐junction PV devices made with material representative of the individual junctions in the MJ cells. The RR PT's main purpose was to assess the capability of the participating laboratories, in terms of employed facilities and procedures, to test MJ PV devices. Therefore, participants were requested to perform STC measurements of all cells according to their own procedure, which might not include external quantum efficiency measurements. The European Solar Test Installation (ESTI) of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) provided the reference calibrations against which the participants' results are compared. ESTI made also a verification of the cells performance at STC at the end of the RR PT, in order to allow a comparison between the initial stable state at which the cells were calibrated (just before circulation) and the one they had reached at the end of the RR PT. The overall results of the RR PT are here presented and discussed together with some aspects of MJ PV testing that emerged as not adequately applied orAbstract: A round‐robin proficiency test (RR PT) on thin‐film multi‐junction (MJ) photovoltaic (PV) cells was run between 13 laboratories within the European project CHEETAH. Five encapsulated PV cells were circulated to participants for being tested at Standard Test Conditions (STC). Three cells were a‐Si/μc‐Si tandem PV devices, each of which had a different short‐circuit current ratio between the top junction and the bottom one; the remaining two cells were single‐junction PV devices made with material representative of the individual junctions in the MJ cells. The RR PT's main purpose was to assess the capability of the participating laboratories, in terms of employed facilities and procedures, to test MJ PV devices. Therefore, participants were requested to perform STC measurements of all cells according to their own procedure, which might not include external quantum efficiency measurements. The European Solar Test Installation (ESTI) of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) provided the reference calibrations against which the participants' results are compared. ESTI made also a verification of the cells performance at STC at the end of the RR PT, in order to allow a comparison between the initial stable state at which the cells were calibrated (just before circulation) and the one they had reached at the end of the RR PT. The overall results of the RR PT are here presented and discussed together with some aspects of MJ PV testing that emerged as not adequately applied or largely missing. Their full implementation is expected to improve the consistency of future results. Abstract : A round‐robin proficiency test for STC performance assessment of multi‐junction photovoltaic cells was run between 13 laboratories with different levels of expertise, plus the JRC ESTI as the reference laboratory. Most laboratories show large P max deviations from the reference. These can be linked to inaccurate spectral corrections, which can originate from the reference cell(s) used to adjust the solar simulator, from spectral irradiance measurement, from DUT EQE measurement (e.g., no bias voltage application) or from a combination of all these. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Progress in photovoltaics. Volume 28:Number 12(2020)
- Journal:
- Progress in photovoltaics
- Issue:
- Volume 28:Number 12(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 12 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0028-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1258
- Page End:
- 1276
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09-10
- Subjects:
- amorphous/micromorphous silicon -- interlaboratory comparison -- round‐robin proficiency test -- STC characterisation -- tandem a‐Si/μc‐Si -- thin‐film multi‐junction PV solar cell
Solar cells -- Periodicals
Photovoltaic cells -- Periodicals
Solar power plants -- Periodicals
621.31245 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/pip.3322 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1062-7995
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6873.060000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14889.xml