Mini-Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery Using Smaller Ports Minimizes Incisional Pain and Postoperative Scar Size: A Paired Sample Analysis. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boza, Aysen; Urman, Bulent; Vatansever, Dogan; Ceyhan, Mehmet; Mısırlıoglu, Selim; Koca, Sema; Çapraz, Kevser; Tunga Dogan, Alper; Taskıran, Cagatay
• Is Part Of: Surgical innovation. Volume 27:Number 5(2020)
• Page Start: 455
• Page End: 460
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: mini-laparoscopy -- gynecology -- port size -- pain -- cosmesis; Surgery, Operative -- Periodicals; Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive -- Periodicals; Diffusion of Innovation -- Periodicals; Chirurgie opératoire -- Périodiques; Chirurgie endoscopique -- Périodiques; Chirurgie laparoscopique -- Périodiques; 617.91
• DOI: 10.1177/1553350620923526
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1553-3506

Abstract

Objective . The aim of this study was to assess postoperative incisional pain and cosmetic scores in mini-laparoscopic gynecological surgeries undertaken with different port sizes. Material and Method . In this prospective study, all women who underwent mini-laparoscopic gynecological surgery with 2.4-, 3-, and 5-mm lateral ports for benign gynecological conditions between March 2017 and April 2019 were included. The primary outcome was postoperative incisional pain at rest, walking, and after a provoked Valsalva maneuver assessed by numeric rating scale scores at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 3 days and 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included cosmetic scores of each port site (evaluated by using patient-observer scar assessment scale [POSAS]), operation time, and intra- and postoperative complications. Results . A total of 330 lateral port sites in 110 patients who underwent benign gynecological surgery via mini-laparoscopy were assessed for pain and cosmetic appearance. Pain scores at each time point were significantly lower for 2.4- and 3-mm ports than those for 5-mm ports; however, no significant difference was detected between 2.4-mm and 3-mm port sites ( P = .6). The difference was more evident at 24 hours when routine analgesic drugs were stopped ( P = .004). For POSAS scores, both 2.4-mm and 3-mm ports were superior to 5-mm port sites ( P = .002); however, there was no significant difference between 2.4-mm and 3-mm port sites ( P = .2). There were 2 port-related complications: one subcutaneous emphysema and one bleeding from a 5-mm trocar site 1 hour after surgery. Conclusion . Mini-laparoscopic gynecologic surgery using smaller ports resulted in decreased postoperative incisional pain and superior cosmetic appearance.