Recommendations to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research. Issue 6 (1st June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brito, Jaqueline J; Li, Jun; Moore, Jason H; Greene, Casey S; Nogoy, Nicole A; Garmire, Lana X; Mangul, Serghei
• Is Part Of: GigaScience. Volume 9:Issue 6(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-06-01
• Subjects: rigor -- reproducible research -- installability -- archival stability -- big data -- open science; Information storage and retrieval systems -- Research -- Periodicals; Biology -- Research -- Periodicals; Medical sciences -- Research -- Periodicals; Database management -- Periodicals; 570.285
• DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa056
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-217X

Abstract

Abstract: Biomedical research depends increasingly on computational tools, but mechanisms ensuring open data, open software, and reproducibility are variably enforced by academic institutions, funders, and publishers. Publications may present software for which source code or documentation are or become unavailable; this compromises the role of peer review in evaluating technical strength and scientific contribution. Incomplete ancillary information for an academic software package may bias or limit subsequent work. We provide 8 recommendations to improve reproducibility, transparency, and rigor in computational biology—precisely the values that should be emphasized in life science curricula. Our recommendations for improving software availability, usability, and archival stability aim to foster a sustainable data science ecosystem in life science research.