Timescale and colony-dependent relationships between environmental conditions and plasma oxidative markers in a long-lived bat species. Issue 1 (14th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beaulieu, Michaël; Touzalin, Frédéric; Dool, Serena E; Teeling, Emma C; Puechmaille, Sébastien J
• Editors: Cooke, Steven
• Is Part Of: Conservation physiology. Volume 8:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-09-14
• Subjects: Bats -- biomarkers -- oxidative status -- temperature anomalies; Nature -- Effect of human beings on -- Periodicals; Conservation biology -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coaa083
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2051-1434

Abstract

Abstract : Physiological markers can be used in conservation studies if they reliably reflect environmental perturbations. Here, two oxidative markers reflected environmental conditions experienced by greater mouse-eared bats. However, the magnitude of the variation in oxidative markers differed among nearby colonies, suggesting that, if necessary, a one-size-fits-all conservation approach would be inappropriate. Abstract: To increase the applicability and success of physiological approaches in conservation plans, conservation physiology should be based on ecologically relevant relationships between physiological markers and environmental variation that can only be obtained from wild populations. Given their integrative and multifaceted aspects, markers of oxidative status have recently been considered in conservation physiology, but still need to be validated across environmental conditions and locations. Here, we examined whether inter-annual variation in two oxidative markers, plasma antioxidant capacity and plasma hydroperoxides, followed inter-annual variation in temperature anomalies and associated vegetation changes in four colonies of long-lived greater mouse-eared bats ( Myotis myotis ) monitored over five consecutive years. We found that the plasma antioxidant capacity of bats decreased while plasma hydroperoxide concentrations increased with increasing temperature anomalies occurring in the two weeks before blood sampling. Moreover, the antioxidant defences of these bats reflected vegetation indices, which themselves reflected the thermal conditions experienced by bats in their foraging habitat. Variation in oxidative markers therefore appears to be due to variation in thermoregulatory costs and to indirect changes in foraging costs. Overall, these results validate the use of markers of oxidative status in conservation physiology to monitor thermal perturbations recently experienced by animals in their natural habitat. However, even though oxidative markers varied in the same direction in all four bat colonies across years, the amplitude of their response differed. If these different physiological responses reflect different performances (e.g. productivity, survival rate) between colonies, this implies that, if necessary, conservation measures may need to be applied at the local scale.