The impact of feed efficiency selection on the ruminal, cecal, and fecal microbiomes of Angus steers from a commercial feedlot. (20th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Welch, Christina B; Lourenco, Jeferson M; Davis, Dylan B; Krause, Taylor R; Carmichael, Mia N; Rothrock, Michael J; Pringle, T Dean; Callaway, Todd R
• Is Part Of: Journal of animal science. Volume 98:Number 7(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-07-20
• Subjects: 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid -- feedlot cattle -- gastrointestinal microbiota -- residual feed intake -- Ruminococcaceae; Livestock -- Periodicals; Livestock; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 636.005
• DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa230
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8812

Abstract

Abstract: Feed is the greatest cost of animal production, so reducing it is critical to increase producer profits. In ruminants, the microbial population within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT ) is critical to nutrient digestion and absorption in both the rumen and the hindgut. The objective of this study was to determine the bacterial taxonomic profile of the rumen, cecum, and feces of feedlot steers at slaughter in order to link feed efficiency and the GIT bacterial populations from these three locations. Twenty commercial Angus steers were selected and divided into two groups according to their residual feed intake (RFI ) classification determined during the feedlot-finishing period: high-RFI ( n = 10) and low-RFI ( n = 10). After the ruminal, cecal, and fecal samples were collected at slaughter, DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed on them to determine their bacterial composition. One-way ANOVA was performed on the animal performance data, alpha diversities, and bacterial abundances using RFI classification as the fixed effect. Overall, the ruminal bacterial population was the most different in terms of taxonomic profile compared with the cecal and fecal populations as revealed by beta diversity analysis ( P < 0.001). Moreover, bacterial richness (Chao1) was greatest ( P = 0.01) in the rumen of the high-RFI group compared with the low-RFI group. In contrast, bacterial richness and diversity in the intestinal environment showed that Chao1 was greater ( P = 0.01) in the cecum, and the Shannon diversity index was greater in both the cecum and feces of low-RFI compared with high-RFI steers ( P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Ruminococcaceae was more abundant in the low-RFI group in the cecum and feces ( P = 0.01); fecal Bifidobacteriaceae was more abundant in high-RFI steers ( P = 0.03). No correlations ( P ≥ 0.13) between any ruminal bacterial family and RFI were detected; however, Ruminococcaceae, Mogibacteriaceae, Christensenellaceae, and BS11 were negatively correlated with RFI ( P < 0.05) in the cecum and feces. Succinivibrionaceae in the cecum was positively correlated with RFI ( P = 0.05), and fecal Bifidobacteriaceae was positively correlated with RFI ( P = 0.03). Results collectively indicate that in addition to the ruminal bacteria, the lower gut bacterial population has a significant impact on feed efficiency and nutrient utilization in feedlot steers; therefore, the intestinal bacteria should also be considered when examining the basis of ruminant feed efficiency.