Randomized Trial of 2 Self-Titrated Oral Appliances for Airway Management. (February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schneiderman, E.; Schramm, P.; Hui, J.; Wilson, P. D.; Moura, P.; German, Z.; McCann, A.; Newton, M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of dental research. Volume 100:Number 2(2021)
• Page Start: 155
• Page End: 162
• Publication Date: 2021-02
• Subjects: obstructive sleep apnea -- respiratory tract -- occlusal splints -- comparative effectiveness research -- crossover studies -- polysomnography; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Research -- Periodicals; 617.6005
• DOI: 10.1177/0022034520956977
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-0345

Abstract

The effectiveness and predictability of 2 different oral appliance (OA) designs to reduce the respiratory event index (REI) in moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients requires elucidation. The primary aim of the trial was to determine if 2 widely used midline-traction and bilateral-thrust OA designs differ in effectiveness to reduce the REI within a single test population categorized by OSA severity. Moderate and severe adult OSA patients, who were previously prescribed continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) but were dissatisfied with it ( n = 56), were studied by home-polygraphy in a randomized crossover trial using either midline-traction with restricted mouth opening (MR) or bilateral thrust with opening permitted (BP) design OAs. OAs were used nightly for 4 wk (T2) followed by a 1-wk washout period, then 4 wk (T4) using the alternate OA. REI and oxygen saturation (SaO2 ) were primary outcomes, while predictability and efficacy comparison of the 2 OAs were secondary outcomes. Thirty-six participants had used MR and BP OAs during both 4-wk study legs. Twenty (55.6%) MR OA-using participants, 25 (69.4%) BP OA-using participants, and 16 (44.4%) participants using both OAs had significant REI reductions. Overall baseline (T0) median REI (interquartile range) of 33.7 (20.7–54.9) was reduced to 18.0 (8.5–19.4) at T2 and to 12.5 (8.2–15.9) at T4 ( P < 0.001). Comparison of the 2 sequence groups' (MR-BP and BP-MR) REI showed the median differences between T0 and T2 and T4 were highly significant ( P < 0.001). Regression analysis predicted about half of all users will have REIs between 8 and 16 after 2 mo. Baseline overjet measures >2.9 mm predicted greater OA advancement at T4. Mean and minimum SaO2 did not change significantly from T0 to T2 or T4. MR and BP OA designs similarly attenuated REI in moderate and severe OSA individuals who completed the 8-wk study protocol with greater REI reduction in those with severe OSA (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03219034).