A 2‐Phase Merge Filter Approach to Computer‐Aided Detection of Breast Tumors on 3‐Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging. (21st June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chiu, Ling‐Ying; Kuo, Wen‐Hung; Chen, Chiung‐Nien; Chang, King‐Jen; Chen, Argon
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 39:Number 12(2020)
• Page Start: 2439
• Page End: 2455
• Publication Date: 2020-06-21
• Subjects: 3‐dimensional automated breast ultrasound -- breast tumor -- computer‐aided detection -- 2‐phase merge filter; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.1002/jum.15365
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The role of image analysis in 3‐dimensional (3D) automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) images is increasingly important because of its widespread use as a screening tool in whole‐breast examinations. However, reviewing a large number of images acquired from ABUS is time‐consuming and sometimes error prone. The aim of this study, therefore, was to develop an efficient computer‐aided detection (CADe) algorithm to assist the review process. Methods: The proposed CADe algorithm consisted of 4 major steps. First, initial tumor candidates were formed by extracting and merging hypoechoic square cells on 2‐dimensional (2D) transverse images. Second, a feature‐based classifier was then constructed using 2D features to filter out nontumor candidates. Third, the remaining 2D candidates were merged longitudinally into 3D masses. Finally, a 3D feature‐based classifier was used to further filter out nontumor masses to obtain the final detected masses. The proposed method was validated with 176 passes of breast images acquired by an Acuson S2000 automated breast volume scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA), including 44 normal passes and 132 abnormal passes containing 162 proven lesions (79 benign and 83 malignant). Results: The proposed CADe system could achieve overall sensitivity of 100% and 90% with 6.71 and 5.14 false‐positives (FPs) per pass, respectively. Our results also showed that the average number of FPs per normal pass (7.16) was more than the number of FPs per abnormal pass (6.56) at 100% sensitivity. Conclusions: The proposed CADe system has a great potential for becoming a good companion tool with ABUS imaging by ensuring high sensitivity with a relatively small number of FPs.