Predictive classifier for intensive treatment of head and neck cancer. Issue 24 (5th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zakeri, Kaveh; Rotolo, Federico; Lacas, Benjamin; Vitzthum, Lucas K.; Le, Quynh‐Thu; Gregoire, Vincent; Overgaard, Jens; Hackshaw, Allan; Zackrisson, Björn; Parmar, Mahesh K. B.; Burtness, Barbara A.; Ghi, Maria Grazia; Sanguineti, Giuseppe; O'Sullivan, Brian; Fortpied, Catherine; Bourhis, Jean; Shen, Hanjie; Harris, Jonathan; Michiels, Stefan; Pignon, Jean‐Pierre; Mell, Loren K.
• Is Part Of: Cancer. Volume 126:Issue 24(2020)
• Page Start: 5263
• Page End: 5273
• Publication Date: 2020-10-05
• Subjects: altered fractionation -- chemotherapy -- competing risks -- head and neck cancer; Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Cytopathology -- Periodicals; 616.99405
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33212
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0008-543X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the effectiveness of intensive treatment for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) depends on the proportion of patients' overall event risk attributable to cancer. Methods: This study analyzed 22, 339 patients with LAHNC treated in 81 randomized trials testing altered fractionation (AFX; Meta‐Analysis of Radiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH] data set) or chemotherapy (Meta‐Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH‐NC] data set). Generalized competing event regression was applied to the control arms in MARCH, and patients were stratified by tertile according to the ω score, which quantified the relative hazard for cancer versus competing events. The classifier was externally validated on the MACH‐NC data set. The study tested for interactions between the ω score and treatment effects on overall survival (OS). Results: Factors associated with a higher ω score were a younger age, a better performance status, an oral cavity site, higher T and N categories, and a p16‐negative/unknown status. The effect of AFX on OS was greater in patients with high ω scores (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85‐0.99) and medium ω scores (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84‐0.98) versus low ω scores (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90‐1.05; P for interaction = .086). The effect of chemotherapy on OS was significantly greater in patients with high ω scores (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75‐0.88) and medium ω scores (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78‐0.93) versus low ω scores (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86‐1.08; P for interaction = .011). Conclusions: LAHNC patients with a higher risk of cancer progression relative to competing mortality, as reflected by a higher ω score, selectively benefit from more intensive treatment. Abstract : The ω score measures the proportion of patients' overall event risk attributable to cancer. Based on 2 large meta‐analyses of head and neck cancer, an ω score has been created and externally validated to predict the benefit of intensive treatment.