Ultrasound Imaging Is Reliable for Tibialis Posterior Size Measurements. (15th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johnson, A. Wayne; Bruening, Dustin A.; Violette, Victoria A.; Perkins, Keisha V.; Thompson, Christopher L.; Ridge, Sarah T.
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 39:Number 12(2020)
• Page Start: 2305
• Page End: 2312
• Publication Date: 2020-05-15
• Subjects: medial longitudinal arch -- morphology -- musculoskeletal imaging protocol -- posterior tibial tendon dysfunction; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.1002/jum.15340
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The tibialis posterior (TP) is a vital muscle for controlling the medial longitudinal arch of the foot during weight‐bearing activities. Dysfunction of this muscle is associated with a variety of pathologic conditions; thus, it is important to reliably assess its morphologic characteristics. Ultrasound (US) has been used to assess characteristics of TP tendons but not the muscle cross‐sectional area (CSA). The purpose of this study was to establish a reliable US technique to measure the TP CSA and thickness. Methods: Twenty‐three healthy volunteers participated. We evaluated the CSA and thickness at 4 measurement locations (anterior and posterior views at both 30% and 50% of the shank length). Results: The participants included 12 female and 11 male volunteers (mean age ± SD, 31.23 ± 14.93 years). Excellent reliability was seen for the CSA and thickness at all locations (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.988–0.998). Limits of agreement (LoA) and standard errors of the measurement (SEMs) were slightly lower at the 30% locations (LoA at 30%, 4.6–9.2; LoA at 50%, 6.4–9.7; SEM at 30%, 0.03–0.05; SEM at 50%, 0.04–0.07). Strong correlations were seen between anterior and posterior measurements of the CSA (30%, r = 0.99; P < .0001; 50%, r = 0.94; P < .0001) and thickness (30%, r = 0.98; P < .0001; 50%, r = 0.95; P = .0001). Conclusions: Based on these results, the TP can be measured accurately with US at any of the tested locations. Due to the ease of collection and the quality of the data, we recommend the anterior view at 30% of the shank length to measure the CSA. The ability to assess muscle size of the TP will aid in a variety of medical and research applications.