Comparing the environmental sustainability of two gold production methods using integrated Emergy and Life Cycle Assessment. (December 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparing the environmental sustainability of two gold production methods using integrated Emergy and Life Cycle Assessment. (December 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparing the environmental sustainability of two gold production methods using integrated Emergy and Life Cycle Assessment
- Authors:
- Cano Londoño, Natalia A.
Velásquez, Héctor I.
McIntyre, Neil - Abstract:
- Highlights: Critical assessment of the applicability of emergy accounting to alternative gold mining methods. Mines exhibit low apparent sustainability because of emergy demands of non-renewable resources. A new method of integrating emissions into emergy worsens the apparent sustainability of the mines. Abstract: Emergy analysis and combined emergy and Life Cycle Assessment (EM-LCA) were used to evaluate the sustainability of an open-pit gold mine and an alluvial gold mine in Colombia. The emergy is the work done to support the gold production separated into renewable and non-renewable energy, and also into those associated directly with the mining and those due to imported resources. The EM-LCA is a new extension of emergy that incorporates the work done by the environment to assimilate airborne and waterborne pollutants. Emergy Sustainability Index values <1 indicate an unsustainable practice, those between 1 and 5 indicate a sustainable contribution in the medium term but not necessarily in the long term, and those >5 can be considered sustainable. The open-pit and alluvial mines were found to have Emergy Sustainability Index values of 0.02 and 0.04 respectively using emergy accounting, and 0.002 and 0.035 using EM-LCA. The low values from the emergy analysis are mainly due to the large amount of imported resources required by the gold production. The open-pit mine uses a more highly industrialized process and hence relies more on imported resources and less on renewableHighlights: Critical assessment of the applicability of emergy accounting to alternative gold mining methods. Mines exhibit low apparent sustainability because of emergy demands of non-renewable resources. A new method of integrating emissions into emergy worsens the apparent sustainability of the mines. Abstract: Emergy analysis and combined emergy and Life Cycle Assessment (EM-LCA) were used to evaluate the sustainability of an open-pit gold mine and an alluvial gold mine in Colombia. The emergy is the work done to support the gold production separated into renewable and non-renewable energy, and also into those associated directly with the mining and those due to imported resources. The EM-LCA is a new extension of emergy that incorporates the work done by the environment to assimilate airborne and waterborne pollutants. Emergy Sustainability Index values <1 indicate an unsustainable practice, those between 1 and 5 indicate a sustainable contribution in the medium term but not necessarily in the long term, and those >5 can be considered sustainable. The open-pit and alluvial mines were found to have Emergy Sustainability Index values of 0.02 and 0.04 respectively using emergy accounting, and 0.002 and 0.035 using EM-LCA. The low values from the emergy analysis are mainly due to the large amount of imported resources required by the gold production. The open-pit mine uses a more highly industrialized process and hence relies more on imported resources and less on renewable resources. Open-pit mining also generates more emissions hence its comparatively low EM-LCA rating. The results demonstrate the need to implement management policies that encourage a higher dependence on renewable resources and to reduce reliance on imported resources, as well the need for technologies that lower emissions. It is also concluded that the novel EM-LCA approach has the potential to extend emergy analysis to incorporate emissions. The study also highlights the limitations of emergy accounting for coherent assessment of mining projects. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Ecological indicators. Volume 107(2019)
- Journal:
- Ecological indicators
- Issue:
- Volume 107(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 107, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 107
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0107-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-12
- Subjects:
- Emergy accounting -- Life cycle assessment -- Alluvial mining -- Open-pit mining -- Sustainability
Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals
Environmental management -- Periodicals
Environmental impact analysis -- Periodicals
Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals
Sustainable development -- Periodicals
333.71405 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1470160X/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105600 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1470-160X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3648.877200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14810.xml