Phase diagrams and mechanical properties of TiC-SiC solid solutions from first-principles. (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mediukh, N.R.; Ivashchenko, V.I.; Turchi, P.E.A.; Shevchenko, V.I.; Leszczynski, Jerzy; Gorb, Leonid
• Is Part Of: Calphad. Volume 66(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: TiC-SiC -- Solid solutions -- First-principles calculation -- Phase diagram -- Stability -- Elastic moduli -- Mechanical and thermodynamic properties; Phase diagrams -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Thermochemistry -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Diagrammes de phases -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Thermochimie -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Thermodynamica; Electronic journals; 541.363
• DOI: 10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101643
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0364-5916

Abstract

Abstract: First-principles calculations were carried out in order to investigate the stability and properties of the random Ti1-x Six C solid solutions (alloys) with both the B1 and B3 structures. Lattice parameter, total energy, formation energy, phonon spectra, and elastic properties were studied as functions of composition. The phase diagram, in particular, binodal and spinodal curves were calculated. It was established that at 0 K the B1 alloys are energetically favorable at 0 ≤ x < 0.5, while the B3 alloys are favorable at 0.5 ≤ x ≤ 1.0. It was found that the contribution to the Gibbs free energy coming from the lattice vibrations strongly reduces the critical temperature of stabilization of the solid solutions. Calculated elastic moduli, Debye temperature, and Vickers hardness do not point to any strength enhancement of the alloys compared to TiC and SiC. Analysis of the spatial distribution of the Young and shear moduli shows that the B3 alloys exhibit much more spatial anisotropy of the elastic moduli than the B1 alloys. Highlights: First-principles investigation of phase diagrams and mechanical properties of TiC-SiC alloys were performed. B1 alloys are energetically favorable in the range 0 ≤ x < 0.5, whereas the B3 ones are favorable in the range 0.5 ≤ x ≤ 1.0. There is no strength enhancement for the intermediate compositions. B3 alloys exhibit much more spatial anisotropy of the elastic moduli than the B1 ones.