Comparison of lidocaine/tetracaine cream and lidocaine/prilocaine cream for local anaesthesia during laser treatment of acne keloidalis nuchae and tattoo removal: results of two randomized controlled trials. (10th December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of lidocaine/tetracaine cream and lidocaine/prilocaine cream for local anaesthesia during laser treatment of acne keloidalis nuchae and tattoo removal: results of two randomized controlled trials. (10th December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of lidocaine/tetracaine cream and lidocaine/prilocaine cream for local anaesthesia during laser treatment of acne keloidalis nuchae and tattoo removal: results of two randomized controlled trials
- Authors:
- Greveling, K.
Prens, E.P.
ten Bosch, N.
van Doorn, M. B. - Abstract:
- Abstract : What's already known about this topic? Pain is a common adverse effect during dermatological laser procedures, which can be alleviated using a topical anaesthetic cream. What does this study add? Lidocaine/tetracaine self‐occlusive cream was not superior to lidocaine/prilocaine cream under plastic occlusion in reducing self‐reported pain during laser treatment of acne keloidalis nuchae and tattoo removal. Lidocaine/prilocaine cream under occlusion is the preferred topical anaesthetic during laser procedures when targeting dermal chromophores. Summary: Background: Pain is a common adverse effect of dermatological laser procedures. Currently, no standard topical anaesthetic cream exists for deeper dermal laser procedures. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of lidocaine/tetracaine cream and lidocaine/prilocaine cream in reducing self‐reported pain during deeper dermal laser treatment of acne keloidalis nuchae (AKN) and tattoos. Methods: We conducted two randomized, double‐blind, controlled clinical trials with intrapatient, split‐lesion designs: study A included patients with AKN ( n = 15); study B included patients with black tattoos ( n = 15). The primary end point was the patients' self‐reported pain on a 10‐cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary objectives were the percentage of patients with adequate pain relief, willingness to pay €25 for the cream that provided the best pain relief and safety of the creams. Results: In both studies, VAS scores were lowerAbstract : What's already known about this topic? Pain is a common adverse effect during dermatological laser procedures, which can be alleviated using a topical anaesthetic cream. What does this study add? Lidocaine/tetracaine self‐occlusive cream was not superior to lidocaine/prilocaine cream under plastic occlusion in reducing self‐reported pain during laser treatment of acne keloidalis nuchae and tattoo removal. Lidocaine/prilocaine cream under occlusion is the preferred topical anaesthetic during laser procedures when targeting dermal chromophores. Summary: Background: Pain is a common adverse effect of dermatological laser procedures. Currently, no standard topical anaesthetic cream exists for deeper dermal laser procedures. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of lidocaine/tetracaine cream and lidocaine/prilocaine cream in reducing self‐reported pain during deeper dermal laser treatment of acne keloidalis nuchae (AKN) and tattoos. Methods: We conducted two randomized, double‐blind, controlled clinical trials with intrapatient, split‐lesion designs: study A included patients with AKN ( n = 15); study B included patients with black tattoos ( n = 15). The primary end point was the patients' self‐reported pain on a 10‐cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary objectives were the percentage of patients with adequate pain relief, willingness to pay €25 for the cream that provided the best pain relief and safety of the creams. Results: In both studies, VAS scores were lower for lidocaine/prilocaine cream, with a mean VAS difference in study A of 1·9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·0–2·8] and in study B of 0·6 (95% CI −0·7 to 1·9). In study A, adequate pain relief was achieved in 13% ( n = 2) with lidocaine/tetracaine cream vs. 73% ( n = 11) with lidocaine/prilocaine cream ( P = 0·004), and in study B in 53% ( n = 8) vs. 80% ( n = 12), respectively ( P = 0·289). In study A, 47% ( n = 7) were willing to pay an additional €25 vs. 73% ( n = 11) in study B. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Lidocaine/prilocaine cream under plastic occlusion is the preferred topical anaesthetic during painful laser procedures targeting dermal chromophores. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of dermatology. Volume 176:Number 1(2017)
- Journal:
- British journal of dermatology
- Issue:
- Volume 176:Number 1(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 176, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 176
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0176-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 81
- Page End:
- 86
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12-10
- Subjects:
- Dermatology -- Periodicals
Skin -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2133 ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjd ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/bjd.14848 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-0963
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2307.400000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14818.xml