Data analysis implications of moderately eccentric gravitational waves. (26th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moore, Blake; Yunes, Nicolás
• Is Part Of: Classical and quantum gravity. Volume 37:Number 22(2020:Nov.)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-26
• Subjects: gravitational waves -- parameter estimation -- compact binary; Quantum gravity -- Periodicals; Gravitation -- Periodicals; Relativity (Physics) -- Periodicals; Space and time -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 521.1
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab7963
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-9381

Abstract

Abstract: While the expectation is that the majority of gravitational wave events observable by ground-based detectors will be emitted by compact binaries in quasi-circular orbits, the growing number of detections suggests the possibility of detecting waves from binaries with non-negligible orbital eccentricity in the near future. Several gravitational wave models incorporate the effects of small orbital eccentricities ( e ≲ 0.2), but these models may not be sufficient to analyze waves from systems with moderate eccentricity. We recently developed an inspiral only gravitational wave model that faithfully accounts for eccentric corrections in the moderate eccentricity regime ( e ≲ 0.8 for certain source masses) at 3rd post-Newtonian order. Here we consider the data analysis implications of this particular waveform model by producing and analyzing posteriors via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. We find that the accuracy to which eccentricity and source masses can be measured can increase by 2 orders of magnitude with increasing eccentricity of the signal. We also find that signals with low eccentricity can be confidently identified as eccentric as soon as their eccentricity exceeds 0.008 (0.05) for low (high) mass systems, suggesting eccentric detections are likely to come first from low-mass systems. We complete our analysis by investigating the systematic (mismodeling) error inherent in our post-Newtonian model, finding that for signals with a signal-to-noise ratio of 15, the systematic error is below the statistical error for eccentricities as high as 0.8 (0.5) for low (high) mass systems. We also investigate the systematic error that arises from using a model that neglects eccentricity when the signal is truly eccentric, finding that the systematic error exceeds the statistical error in mass for eccentricities as small as 0.02. As a byproduct of this work we also present some new measures of the accuracy of our model, and investigate the efficiency of the model. We also show that the model is efficient enough to be useful for data analysis provided we are in a mass range in which an inspiral only model is valid. In the higher mass cases, this work points to the importance of developing IMR models.