Empowering phase II clinical trials to reduce phase III failures. (14th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: De Martini, Daniele
• Is Part Of: Pharmaceutical statistics. Volume 19:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 178
• Page End: 186
• Publication Date: 2019-11-14
• Subjects: economic evaluations -- estimation errors -- expanding phase II -- failure reasons; Pharmacy -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Pharmacy -- Statistics -- Periodicals; 615.10727
• DOI: 10.1002/pst.1980
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1539-1604

Abstract

Abstract : The large number of failures in phase III clinical trials, which occur at a rate of approximately 45%, is studied herein relative to possible countermeasures. First, the phenomenon of failures is numerically described. Second, the main reasons for failures are reported, together with some generic improvements suggested in the related literature. This study shows how statistics explain, but do not justify, the high failure rate observed. The rate of failures due to a lack of efficacy that are not expected, is considered to be at least 10%. Expanding phase II is the simplest and most intuitive way to reduce phase III failures since it can reduce phase III false negative findings and launches of phase III trials when the treatment is positive but suboptimal. Moreover, phase II enlargement is discussed using an economic profile. As resources for research are often limited, enlarging phase II should be evaluated on a case‐by‐case basis. Alternative strategies, such as biomarker‐based enrichments and adaptive designs, may aid in reducing failures. However, these strategies also have very low application rates with little likelihood of rapid growth.