Assessment of fragility models based on the Sept 19th, 2017 earthquake observed damage. Issue 125 (October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Román-De La Sancha, A.; Mayoral, J.M.; Hutchinson, T.C.; Candia, G.; Montgomery, J.; Tepalcapa, S.
• Is Part Of: Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. Issue 125(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-10
• Subjects: Seismic vulnerability -- Seismic fragility curves -- Mexico city; Soil dynamics -- Periodicals; Earthquake engineering -- Periodicals; Sols -- Dynamique -- Périodiques; Génie parasismique -- Périodiques; 624.176205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105707
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0267-7261

Abstract

Abstract: Seismic vulnerability evaluations of buildings and critical infrastructure in densely populated cities strongly rely on fragility curves to estimate the probability of reaching or exceeding a given state of damage. Currently, however, the predicting capabilities of these models is limited. This paper presents a critical study of the accuracy of fragility curves for buildings, urban bridges, tunnels, overpasses, main roads, avenues and metro stations, aiming at establishing its advantages and shortcomings, when using them in seismic vulnerability and resilience assessments. Data gathered from one of the most damage areas during the 7.1 Mw September Mexico-Puebla 2017 earthquake was used in this study. Measured peak ground accelerations, PGA, and permanent ground deformations, PGD, along with appropriate fragility curves were used to establish the probability of having minor, moderate, large damage or collapse of buildings and critical infrastructure components. The damage on the study area documented during field reconnaissance was compared to that which would have been predicted using the fragility curves. Although in some cases, there was a good agreement between predicted and observed damage, overall it was clearly identified the need for developing fragility models that account for soil-structure interaction, and specific structural and ground conditions, to ensure a more reliable risk characterization of the City building stock and infrastructure during an earthquake. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: A general good estimate is observed in most of the cases for minor to moderate damage. Fragility functions failed to capture the observed extensive damage and collapse. Aging, previous damage, ground deformation and structural tilting are not reflected in fragility curves. Regarding bridges and tunnels the fragility models seem to be able to capture the observed damage. More accurate information is needed to develop more reliable seismic fragility curves.