Efficacy and Safety of Multiband Mucosectomy Versus Cap-assisted Endoscopic Resection For Early Esophageal Cancer and Precancerous Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Issue 5 (October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and Safety of Multiband Mucosectomy Versus Cap-assisted Endoscopic Resection For Early Esophageal Cancer and Precancerous Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Issue 5 (October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and Safety of Multiband Mucosectomy Versus Cap-assisted Endoscopic Resection For Early Esophageal Cancer and Precancerous Lesions
- Authors:
- Dan, Xiang
Lv, Xiu-He
San, Zhi-Jie
Geng, Sang
Wang, Yan-Qiang
Li, Shao-Hua
Xie, Hua-Hong - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: The effectiveness of multiband mucosectomy (MBM) for early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions is still in uncertainty. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure and to compare it with cap-assisted endoscopic resection (EMR-cap). Methods: A systematic search of both English and Chinese databases was performed from inception to April 30, 2019. Complete resection rate, local recurrence rate, and procedure time were considered the primary outcome measures. Prevalence of complications was considered the secondary outcome measure. All data analyses were performed using Review Manager Software. Results: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 non-RCTs were included in the final meta-analysis. When compared with the EMR-cap technique, MBM had a similar complete resection rate [odds ratio (OR)=2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-5.60, P =0.14], a similar local recurrence rate (OR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.09-2.67, P =0.42), a shorter resection time (mean difference: −9.08, 95% CI: −13.86 to −4.30, P =0.0002), a shorter procedure time (mean difference: −13.36, 95% CI: −17.85 to −8.86, P <0.00001), a lower bleeding rate (OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.24-0.83, P =0.01), a similar perforation rate (OR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.15-2.06, P =0.37), and a similar stricture rate (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.10-5.84, P =0.80). The results of non-RCTs were consistent with those of RCTs. Conclusions: MBM is similar to EMR-cap in terms of efficacy and safety for endoscopicAbstract : Background: The effectiveness of multiband mucosectomy (MBM) for early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions is still in uncertainty. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure and to compare it with cap-assisted endoscopic resection (EMR-cap). Methods: A systematic search of both English and Chinese databases was performed from inception to April 30, 2019. Complete resection rate, local recurrence rate, and procedure time were considered the primary outcome measures. Prevalence of complications was considered the secondary outcome measure. All data analyses were performed using Review Manager Software. Results: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 non-RCTs were included in the final meta-analysis. When compared with the EMR-cap technique, MBM had a similar complete resection rate [odds ratio (OR)=2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-5.60, P =0.14], a similar local recurrence rate (OR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.09-2.67, P =0.42), a shorter resection time (mean difference: −9.08, 95% CI: −13.86 to −4.30, P =0.0002), a shorter procedure time (mean difference: −13.36, 95% CI: −17.85 to −8.86, P <0.00001), a lower bleeding rate (OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.24-0.83, P =0.01), a similar perforation rate (OR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.15-2.06, P =0.37), and a similar stricture rate (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.10-5.84, P =0.80). The results of non-RCTs were consistent with those of RCTs. Conclusions: MBM is similar to EMR-cap in terms of efficacy and safety for endoscopic resection of early cancer and precancerous lesions of the esophagus. However, MBM is less time-consuming. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. Volume 29:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0029-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10
- Subjects:
- multiband mucosectomy -- endoscopic mucosal resection -- esophageal cancer
Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
Laparoscopy -- Periodicals
617.550597 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00019509-000000000-00000 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00129689-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.surgical-laparoscopy.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/surgical-laparoscopy/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://www.lww.com/Product/1530-4515 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000711 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1530-4515
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8548.234200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14770.xml