"You Want Me to Assess What?": Faculty Perceptions of Assessing Residents From Outside Their Specialty. (October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Burm, Sarah; Sebok-Syer, Stefanie S.; Lingard, Lorelei; VanHooren, Tamara; Chahine, Saad; Goldszmidt, Mark; Watling, Christopher J.
• Is Part Of: Academic medicine. Volume 94:Number 10(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-10
• Subjects: Medical education -- Periodicals; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Medical personnel -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.711
• DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002771
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1040-2446

Abstract

Abstract : Problem: Competency-based medical education (CBME) demands that residents be directly observed performing clinical tasks; however, many faculty lack assessment expertise, and some programs lack resources and faculty numbers to fulfill CBME's mandate. To maximize limited faculty resources, the authors explored training and deploying faculty to assess residents in specialties outside their own. Approach: In spring 2017, 10 MD and 2 PhD assessors at a medium-sized medical school in Ontario, Canada, participated in a 4-hour training session, which focused on providing formative assessments of patient handover, a core competency of medical practice. Assessors were deployed to 2 clinical settings outside their own specialty—critical care and pediatrics—each completing 11 to 26 assessments of residents delivering patient handover. Assessors were subsequently interviewed regarding their experiences. Outcomes: While assessors felt able to judge handover performance outside their specialty, their sense of comfort varied with their own prior experiences in the given settings. Lack of familiarity with the process of handover in a specific setting directly influenced assessors' perceptions of their own credibility. Although assessors identified the potential benefits of cross-specialty assessment, they also cited challenges to sustaining this approach. Next Steps: Findings indicate a possible "contextual threshold" for cross-specialty assessment: tasks with high context specificity might not be suitable for cross-specialty assessment. Introducing higher-fidelity simulation into the training protocol and ensuring faculty members are remunerated for their time are necessary to establish future opportunities for shared assessment resources across training programs. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.