Outcome Comparison of Single-port Versus Multiport Versus Under Direct View Completion Proctectomy With Ileal-Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Issue 5 (October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Outcome Comparison of Single-port Versus Multiport Versus Under Direct View Completion Proctectomy With Ileal-Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Issue 5 (October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Outcome Comparison of Single-port Versus Multiport Versus Under Direct View Completion Proctectomy With Ileal-Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
- Authors:
- Li, Wanglin
Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
Costedio, Meagan
Benlice, Cigdem
Kessler, Hermann
Stocchi, Luca
Gorgun, Emre - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: Whether the reported theoretical benefits of single-port laparoscopic (SPL) approach can be converted to superior clinical outcomes is still unknown for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients undergoing second-stage proctectomy. This study aimed to compare the short-term postoperative and long-term pouch-related functional outcomes of SPL, multiport laparoscopic (MPL), and direct view (DV) completion proctectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (CP/IPAA). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent either SPL, MPL, or under DV CP/IPAA for UC between August 2009 and August 2014 were identified from an institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained institutional database and reviewed. Demographics, patient characteristics, short-term and long-term complications, and morbidity were compared between the 3 groups. Multivariate logistic or Cox regression analysis was conducted for covariate adjustments. Results: Groups (SPL: n=36; MPL: n=67; DV: n=97) were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics and demographics except for age. The SPL group was associated with reduced estimated blood loss, reduced length of stay compared with the MPL and DV groups, and shorter operating time compared with the MPL group ( P <0.001). Similar short-term postoperative and long-term pouch-related functional outcomes were noted without significant differences in quality of life scores among the 3 groups. Conclusions: SPL CP/IPAA for UC can be safely performedAbstract : Purpose: Whether the reported theoretical benefits of single-port laparoscopic (SPL) approach can be converted to superior clinical outcomes is still unknown for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients undergoing second-stage proctectomy. This study aimed to compare the short-term postoperative and long-term pouch-related functional outcomes of SPL, multiport laparoscopic (MPL), and direct view (DV) completion proctectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (CP/IPAA). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent either SPL, MPL, or under DV CP/IPAA for UC between August 2009 and August 2014 were identified from an institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained institutional database and reviewed. Demographics, patient characteristics, short-term and long-term complications, and morbidity were compared between the 3 groups. Multivariate logistic or Cox regression analysis was conducted for covariate adjustments. Results: Groups (SPL: n=36; MPL: n=67; DV: n=97) were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics and demographics except for age. The SPL group was associated with reduced estimated blood loss, reduced length of stay compared with the MPL and DV groups, and shorter operating time compared with the MPL group ( P <0.001). Similar short-term postoperative and long-term pouch-related functional outcomes were noted without significant differences in quality of life scores among the 3 groups. Conclusions: SPL CP/IPAA for UC can be safely performed with superior short-term outcomes such as reduced intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay compared with MPL and under direct view approaches, and shorter operating time compared with MPL. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. Volume 29:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0029-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10
- Subjects:
- single-port laparoscopy -- direct view proctectomy -- completion proctectomy -- ulcerative colitis -- ileal-pouch anal anastomosis
Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
Laparoscopy -- Periodicals
617.550597 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00019509-000000000-00000 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00129689-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.surgical-laparoscopy.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/surgical-laparoscopy/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://www.lww.com/Product/1530-4515 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000674 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1530-4515
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8548.234200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14770.xml