Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Analgesia and Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Relief and Recovery After Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Issue 5 (October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Analgesia and Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Relief and Recovery After Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Issue 5 (October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of the Effects of Epidural Analgesia and Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Pain Relief and Recovery After Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
- Authors:
- Kikuchi, Satoru
Kuroda, Shinji
Nishizaki, Masahiko
Matsusaki, Takashi
Kuwada, Kazuya
Kimura, Yoshikazu
Kagawa, Shunsuke
Morimatsu, Hiroshi
Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: Epidural analgesia (EDA) is an imperative modality for postoperative pain relief after major open abdominal surgery. However, whether EDA has benefits in laparoscopic surgery has not been clear. In this study, the effects of EDA and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) were compared. Methods: This was a retrospective study that included 82 patients undergoing LDG for gastric cancer. Patients received either EDA (n=67) or PCIA (n=15) for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative outcomes and analgesia-related adverse events were compared between the two modalities. Results: EDA and PCIA patients showed no differences in the incidence of complications [9 (13%) vs. 2 (13%); P =0.99] and the length of postoperative hospital stay (9.6±4.5 d vs. 9.7±4.0 d; P =0.90), although the PCIA included poorer preoperative physical status (PS) patients. The number of additional doses of analgesics was higher in the EDA than in the PCIA (1.8±2.4 vs. 0.9±1.0; P =0.01), although postoperative pain scores were similar in the 2 groups. Though the time to first passage of flatus was shorter in the EDA ( P <0.05), more EDA patients developed postoperative hypotension as an adverse event ( P <0.01). The full mobilization day and the day of oral intake tolerance were not significantly different between the 2 groups after surgery. Conclusions: After LDG, EDA may not be indispensable, while PCIA may be the optimal modality forAbstract : Purpose: Epidural analgesia (EDA) is an imperative modality for postoperative pain relief after major open abdominal surgery. However, whether EDA has benefits in laparoscopic surgery has not been clear. In this study, the effects of EDA and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) were compared. Methods: This was a retrospective study that included 82 patients undergoing LDG for gastric cancer. Patients received either EDA (n=67) or PCIA (n=15) for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative outcomes and analgesia-related adverse events were compared between the two modalities. Results: EDA and PCIA patients showed no differences in the incidence of complications [9 (13%) vs. 2 (13%); P =0.99] and the length of postoperative hospital stay (9.6±4.5 d vs. 9.7±4.0 d; P =0.90), although the PCIA included poorer preoperative physical status (PS) patients. The number of additional doses of analgesics was higher in the EDA than in the PCIA (1.8±2.4 vs. 0.9±1.0; P =0.01), although postoperative pain scores were similar in the 2 groups. Though the time to first passage of flatus was shorter in the EDA ( P <0.05), more EDA patients developed postoperative hypotension as an adverse event ( P <0.01). The full mobilization day and the day of oral intake tolerance were not significantly different between the 2 groups after surgery. Conclusions: After LDG, EDA may not be indispensable, while PCIA may be the optimal modality for providing safe and effective postoperative analgesia and recovery. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. Volume 29:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0029-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10
- Subjects:
- laparoscopic distal gastrectomy -- epidural analgesia -- patient-controlled intravenous analgesia -- pain relief -- gastric cancer
Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
Laparoscopy -- Periodicals
617.550597 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00019509-000000000-00000 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00129689-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.surgical-laparoscopy.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/surgical-laparoscopy/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://www.lww.com/Product/1530-4515 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000605 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1530-4515
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8548.234200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14770.xml