Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan. (November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sindiani, Amer Mahmoud; Obeidat, Nail; Alshdaifat, Eman; Elsalem, Lina; Alwani, Mustafa M.; Rawashdeh, Hasan; Fares, Ahmad S.; Alalawne, Tamara; Tawalbeh, Loai Issa
• Is Part Of: Annals of medicine and surgery. Volume 59(2020)
• Page Start: 186
• Page End: 194
• Publication Date: 2020-11
• Subjects: Covid-19 -- Online learning -- Medical students -- Jordan; Surgery -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; General Surgery -- Periodicals; Education, Medical -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 617
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.036
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2049-0801

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: In the spot of the new emerging COVID-19 pandemic and its major impact worldwide on day-to-day activities many rules had to be changed in order to fight this pandemic. Lockdown started in Jordan and around the globe affecting several aspects of life including economy, education, entertainment, and government policies. Regarding education, the priority was to ensure the safety and progress of the educational process. Thus, new methods of teaching had to be applied using the online learning at Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), Faculty of Medicine. This study was done to assess (1) Class Experience (2) Students and Lecturers' Interaction (3) Online Learning Advantages & Disadvantages (4) Students' Preference. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted Convenience sampling technique was used to collect the data from the participants using a survey composed of 18 questions on Google Forms platform. A link was sent to the undergraduate medical students at the Jordan University of Science & Technology via their e-learning accounts (n = 3700). The form was available from May 22nd, 2020 to May 30th, 2020 for 8 days long. Data analysis was done using SPSS V 23. Results: 2212 out of 3700 students responded, (55.8%) of them were in the basic years and (44.2%) of them were in the clinical years. (55.8%) of students started to take online lectures after 3 weeks. (45.7%) used the hybrid teaching method (asynchronous and synchronous), (31.4%) used live classes, and 22.8% recorded classes. Zoom was the most used platform. (48.7%) and (57%) of clinical students and basic students express their interaction as bad, while the others had good and excellent interaction. Maintaining social distance was the most advantage of online teaching, while poor technical setup and no direct contact were the most disadvantage, furthermore inability to have real clinical access was a significant problem for clinical students (p < .001). With reference to students' preferences 75% of students were not pleased with their experience and 42% of students prefer to integrate online learning with traditional learning. Conclusion: Most medical students at JUST preferred the traditional face-to-face teaching method over the solo online teaching methods with recommendations to convert to a more integrated educational system. Also, a well-established infrastructure should be done in involving online teaching. Highlights: The traditional teaching is preferred more than the online one among the students. 43.9% of clinical group students believe that inability to have clinical access is a major obstacle when using the online learning. Students who had underwent online learning before the pandemic are more pleased with their online experience. Online learning helps maintaining social distance among students.