Perceived treatment processes and effects of interactive motion-assisted exposure therapy for veterans with treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: a mixed methods study. Issue 1 (31st December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: van Gelderen, Marieke J.; Nijdam, Mirjam J.; Dubbink, G. Elsemieke; Sleijpen, Marieke; Vermetten, Eric
• Is Part Of: European journal of psychotraumatology. Volume 11:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12-31
• Subjects: Veterans -- PTSD -- 3MDR -- treatment-resistant -- treatment outcome -- virtual reality -- movement -- eye movement desensitization and reprocessing -- qualitative research; Veteranos -- TEPT -- 3MDR -- resistente al tratamiento -- resultado de tratamiento -- realidad virtual -- movimiento -- desensibilización y reprocesamiento del movimiento ocular -- investigación cualitativa; 退伍军人 -- PTSD -- 3MDR -- 难治型 -- 治疗结果 -- 虚拟现实 -- 运动 -- 眼球脱敏和再加工 -- 定性研究; Post-traumatic stress disorder -- Periodicals; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 616.8521
• DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1829400
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2000-8198

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: A novel intervention, Multi-modular motion-assisted memory desensitization and reconsolidation (3MDR), aims to reduce avoidance and improve engagement for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) who did not sufficiently respond to previous treatments. It has been found to effectively reduce PTSD symptoms for veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD. Symptomatic measures alone might not capture all treatment effects, and addition of qualitative outcomes may provide deeper understanding of treatment processes and treatment-induced changes. Objective: To study the perspectives of veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD on 3MDR treatment processes and effects and explore the relation of their experiences to PTSD symptom improvement. Method: A convergent parallel mixed methods design was applied. For the qualitative part, open-ended question interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached (N = 10). Thematic analysis, rooted in grounded theory, was performed. Quantitative data included pre- to posttreatment responder status based on a structured clinical interview for PTSD. Results: Treatment processes endorsed by the veterans were engaging, regulating distress, feeling supported, facing traumatic memories, allowing emotions, associating, and disengaging from trauma. In terms of effects, veterans reported positive changes following 3MDR, including openness, new learning, self-understanding, closure, and reintegration. High comparability across themes was observed for responders and non-responders, except for the themes closure and reintegration, which were reported more often or more in depth by responders. Conclusions: Veterans indicated 3MDR treatment processes that complied with its aims of breaking through avoidance and increasing engagement, thereby facilitating traumatic memory retrieval and processing. However, this did not necessarily translate into PTSD symptom improvement for all veterans. Walking towards trauma-related pictures was highlighted as unique component of 3MDR and connected to specific treatment processes and effects. Positive changes following 3MDR were experienced outside the domain of PTSD symptom improvement, implicating that 3MDR may beneficially impact veterans beyond symptom changes alone. Abstract : HIGHLIGHTS: Veterans with PTSD indicated high engagement in 3MDR leading to processing of traumatic memories. Following 3MDR, increased openness, self-understanding, new learning, closure and reintegration were reported. Similar experiences were reported by responders and non-responders.