Efficacy and safety of chronic antimicrobial suppression therapy for left ventricular assist device driveline infections: A single‐center descriptive experience. Issue 5 (6th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Radcliffe, Christopher; Doilicho, Natnael; Niu, Yu Si; Grant, Matthew
• Is Part Of: Transplant infectious disease. Volume 22:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-07-06
• Subjects: antimicrobial therapy -- driveline infection -- left ventricular assist device -- Staphylococcus aureus; Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Complications -- Periodicals; Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Infection -- Periodicals; 617.01
• DOI: 10.1111/tid.13379
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1398-2273

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Driveline infection (DLI) is the most common left ventricular assist device (LVAD) infectious complication. Short‐term antimicrobial therapy and local debridement are the cornerstones of management for these infections, but the use of chronic antimicrobial suppression (CAS) therapy is not well characterized. Methods: To better characterize the efficacy of CAS therapy, we performed a retrospective review of all patients (N = 219) receiving care at our tertiary transplant center with continuous‐flow LVADs placed between August 2007 and July 2019. Results: A total of 24 patients were identified as having received CAS therapy as treatment for DLIs. The mean age was 56 years, 50% were female, and chronic kidney disease affected 63% of patients. Staphylococcus aureus accounted for half of all initial DLIs, and the mean length of CAS therapy was 486 days (range 48‐2287 days). All patients received per os regimens as suppression therapy. Adverse events impacted 5 of 24 patients (0.43 events per 1000 days). Overall, the use of CAS therapy led to successful outcomes in 50% of patients and 29% experienced treatment failures. The remaining patients experienced stable symptoms. Relapses were the most common cause of treatment failure, and three patients experienced reinfections while on CAS therapy. Conclusions: Our study suggests that CAS therapy for DLIs can be well tolerated, and future studies are needed to determine which patients merit suppression.