Benefit Sharing for Solving Transboundary Commons Dilemma in Central Asia. Issue 1 (18th February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Soliev, Ilkhom; Theesfeld, Insa
• Is Part Of: International Journal of the Commons. Volume 14:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 61
• Page End: 77
• Publication Date: 2020-02-18
• Subjects: appropriation -- provision -- prioritization -- trust building -- civil society
• DOI: 10.5334/ijc.955
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1875-0281

Abstract

Transboundary water governance often represents challenges specific to the commons dilemma. Use of water in one country affects use in another country, yet dynamic and diverse political and socioeconomic factors coupled with relatively large size of a resource system that links not only other sectors such as land and energy but also crosses national jurisdictions make it particularly challenging for interested and affected actors to self-organize. Central Asia represents a typical case of this commons dilemma, where more than 60 million people depend on transboundary waters shared by five independent republics that suffer from vicious cycle of historical rivalry and complexity. We explore whether and how benefit sharing, where the focus is on benefits and not quantities of water, can help solve the transboundary commons dilemma. Further, we suggest distinguishing three priorities in benefit-sharing solutions: economic-development; egalitarian-social; and environmental. Investigating various configurations of prioritization, we discuss selected expressions of it available in the literature in general and from our transboundary waters case study in Central Asia in particular. Based on our findings we stress the importance of setting environmental preservation (restoration) and equitability of sharing as the joint top priority for benefit sharing to be sustainable in the long run, in contrast to a short-term perspective with prevailing economic-development emphasis. In the context of historical distrust conditions and interdependencies, we highlight the mutually important causal relationship between benefit sharing and trust building. For making the new arrangements resilient, particularly in case of large-scale commons, benefit sharing also requires a strong civil society.