Prehospital Epinephrine as a Potential Factor Associated with Prehospital Rearrest. (1st November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yamashita, Akira; Kurosaki, Hisanori; Takada, Kohei; Tanaka, Yoshio; Nishi, Taiki; Wato, Yukihio; Inaba, Hideo
• Is Part Of: Prehospital emergency care. Volume 24:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 741
• Page End: 750
• Publication Date: 2020-11-01
• Subjects: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; rearrest; outcomes; epinephrine; emergency medical service; 362.18
• DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1725197
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1090-3127

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the impact of epinephrine on prehospital rearrest and re-attainment of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods: Data for 9, 292 (≥ 8 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients transported to hospitals by emergency medical services were collected in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan during 2010–2018. Univariate and multivariable analyses were retrospectively performed for 1, 163 patients with prehospital ROSC. Results: Of 1, 163 patients, rearrest occurred in 272 (23.4%) but not in 891 (76.6%). Both single and multiple doses of epinephrine administered before prehospital ROSC (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 3.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.42–5.46 for 1 mg, and 4.27, 2.58–6.79 for ≥ 2 mg) were main factors associated with rearrest. The association between initial and rearrest rhythms was significantly associated with epinephrine administration (p = 0.02). However, the rearrest rhythm was primarily associated with the initial rhythm (p < 0.01). The majority of patients with the non-shockable initial rhythm had pulseless electrical activity (PEA) as the rearrest rhythm, regardless of epinephrine administration (80.4% for administration, 81.6% for no administration). When the initial rhythm was shockable, the primary rearrest rhythms in patients with and without epinephrine administration before prehospital ROSC were PEA (52.2%) and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (56.8%), respectively. Only epinephrine administration after rearrest was associated with prehospital re-attainment of ROSC (adjusted OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.20–5.19). Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that neurologically favorable outcome was poorer in patients with rearrest than those without rearrest (9.9% vs. 25.0%, adjusted OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23–0.73). The total prehospital doses of epinephrine were associated with poorer neurological outcome in a dose-dependent manner (adjusted OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.13–0.36 for 1 mg; 0.09, 0.04–0.19 for 2 mg; 0.03, 0.01–0.09 for ≥ 3 mg, no epinephrine as a reference). Transportation to hospitals with a unit for post-resuscitation care was associated with better neurological outcome (adjusted OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.02–2.32). Conclusions: The requirement for epinephrine administration before prehospital ROSC was associated with subsequent rearrest. Routine epinephrine administrations and rearrest were associated with poorer neurological outcome of OHCA patients with prehospital ROSC.