Current status of universal newborn hearing screening program at 26 institutions in China. (November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wen, Cheng; Li, Xingming; Huang, Lihui; Wang, Xianlei; Zhao, Xuelei; Cheng, Xiaohua; Nie, Wenying; Tang, Xiangrong; Ge, Fang; He, Dinghua; Hu, Shujun; Zheng, Jin; Zhang, Di; Wen, Chunxiu; Zhang, Jin; Wang, Chuan; Ma, Lixia; Lin, Ying; Chen, Yaqiu; Gao, Man; Han, Junning
• Is Part Of: International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. Volume 138(2020:Nov.)
• Publication Date: 2020-11
• Subjects: Hearing loss -- Newborn hearing screening -- Survey; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; Pediatrics -- Periodicals; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; Pediatrics -- Periodicals; Oto-rhino-laryngologie -- Périodiques; Pédiatrie -- Périodiques; 618.9209751
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110131
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0165-5876

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The present study aimed to determine the status of a universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program being conducted in parts of China, by comparing differences in the program findings between 2016 and 2017, as well as across regions in China. Methods: This study investigated a nationally representative sample of newborns from 26 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China. A ''Newborn Hearing Screening Survey'' questionnaire was sent to 43 hearing screening institutions throughout China and the data were analyzed, with appropriate quality control throughout the study process. Results: Twenty-six questionnaires, covering 55.88% (19/34) of the provincial administrative regions in China were appropriately completed. The overall sampling frame comprised 238, 795 (year 2016) and 229, 185 (year 2017) newborns, respectively. We found differences between two years, the initial screening coverage in 2017 (96.10%) was higher than that in 2016 (94.96%); the referral rate at initial screening in 2017 (9.21%) was lower than that in 2016 (10.26%); and the rescreening rate in 2017 (73.50%) was higher than that in 2016 (68.44%). We found differences across three regions, the rescreening rate were highest in West China, the referral rate at rescreening and the referral rate to diagnostic audiological assessment diagnosis were both highest, while the hearing-loss rate was lowest, in the East China in two years. Overall, 61.54% (n = 16) reported using otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), while 38.46% (n = 10) reported using OAEs in combination with automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) tests, for the initial screening. For rescreening, most sites (n = 19, 73.08%) reported using OAEs in combination with AABR, followed by OAEs only (n = 4, 15.38%) and AABR only (n = 3, 11.54%). Of the twenty-six institutions, 57.69% (n = 15) were equipped with a digital information management system for UNHS program, East China had the highest rate of it (81.82%, 9/11). Conclusions: This study indicated that implementation of a UNHS program had essentially been achieved in many regions of China under the guidance of technical specifications for newborn hearing screening. Compared with 2016, the overall quality of the UNHS program had improved in 2017 and that in East China was better than in the Midland and West China. However, national quality control of the UNHS program is still required to enhance the quality of the program and public education needs to be emphasized to improve the rescreening and reception rate.