A DEFENSE OF THE CAROLINGIAN "DEFENSE OF MEDICINE": INTRODUCTION, TRANSLATION, AND NOTES. (2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: GAMBLE, JOEL L.
• Is Part Of: Traditio. Volume 75(2020)
• Page Start: 87
• Page End: 125
• Publication Date: 2020
• Subjects: Carolingian, -- medicine, -- illness, -- physicians, -- patients, -- theology, -- Lorsch; Middle Ages -- History -- Periodicals; Philosophy, Medieval -- Periodicals; Civilization, Medieval -- Periodicals; Theology -- History -- Middle Ages, 600-1500 -- Periodicals; Canon law -- History -- Periodicals; Philosophy, Ancient -- Periodicals; Civilization, Classical -- Periodicals; 940.1
• DOI: 10.1017/tdo.2020.4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0362-1529

Abstract

Abstract : The "Defense of Medicine" prefaces the Codex Bambergensis Medicinalis 1, a Carolingian collection of medical texts. Some scholars have dismissed the Defense as an incoherent patchwork of quotations. Yet, missing from the literature is an adequate assessment of the Defense's arguments. This present study includes the first English translation accompanied by a complete source commentary, a prerequisite for valid content analysis. When read systematically and with attention to the author's use of sources, the Defense is limpid and cogent. Its first purpose is to defend the compatibility of Christian faith and secular medicine. Key propositions include the following: God made nature good, so the natural sciences are reconcilable with divine learning; scripture respects medicine; God expects the sick to avail of physicians and deserves honor for healings done through physicians. Counter-arguments used by the Defense's opponents, who rejected medicine on principle, can also be reconstructed from the text. Two further purposes of the Defense have hitherto been explored insufficiently. After justifying medicine, the Defense addresses sick patients. It encourages them that illness can be spiritually healthful, an instrument for curing their souls. The Defense then addresses caregivers. It tells them why they should succor the sick, even the poor: not for gain or fame, but in imitation of Christ and as if treating Christ himself, whose image the sick bear. The Defense thus contributes to the history of ideas on medicine, health, sickness, and the ethics of altruistic care.