Association Between Hospital Staffing Models and Failure to Rescue. Issue 1 (July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Association Between Hospital Staffing Models and Failure to Rescue. Issue 1 (July 2019)
- Main Title:
- Association Between Hospital Staffing Models and Failure to Rescue
- Authors:
- Ward, Sarah T.
Dimick, Justin B.
Zhang, Wenying
Campbell, Darrell A.
Ghaferi, Amir A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To identify hospital staffing models associated with failure to rescue (FTR) rates at low- and high-performing hospitals. Background: FTR is an important quality measure in surgical safety and is a metric that hospitals are seeking to improve. Specific unit-level determinants of FTR, however, remain unknown. Methods: Retrospective, observational study using data from the Michigan Quality Surgical Collaborative, which is a prospectively collected and clinically audited database in the state of Michigan. We identified 44, 567 patients undergoing major general or vascular surgery from 2008 to 2012. Our main outcome measures were mortality, complications, and FTR rates. Results: Hospital rates of FTR across low, middle, and high tertiles were 8.9%, 16.5%, and 19.9%, respectively ( P < 0.001). Low FTR hospitals tended to have a closed intensive care unit staffing model (56% vs 20%, P < 0.001) and a higher proportion of board-certified intensivists (88% vs 60%, P < 0.001) when compared to high FTR hospitals. There was also significantly more staffing of low FTR hospitals by hospitalists (85% vs 20%, P < 0.001) and residents (62% vs 40%, P < 0.01). Low FTR hospitals were noted to have more overnight coverage (75% vs 45%, P < 0.001) as well as a dedicated rapid response team (90% vs 60%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Low FTR hospitals had significantly more staffing resources than high FTR hospitals. Although hiring additional staff may be beneficial, there remainAbstract : Objective: To identify hospital staffing models associated with failure to rescue (FTR) rates at low- and high-performing hospitals. Background: FTR is an important quality measure in surgical safety and is a metric that hospitals are seeking to improve. Specific unit-level determinants of FTR, however, remain unknown. Methods: Retrospective, observational study using data from the Michigan Quality Surgical Collaborative, which is a prospectively collected and clinically audited database in the state of Michigan. We identified 44, 567 patients undergoing major general or vascular surgery from 2008 to 2012. Our main outcome measures were mortality, complications, and FTR rates. Results: Hospital rates of FTR across low, middle, and high tertiles were 8.9%, 16.5%, and 19.9%, respectively ( P < 0.001). Low FTR hospitals tended to have a closed intensive care unit staffing model (56% vs 20%, P < 0.001) and a higher proportion of board-certified intensivists (88% vs 60%, P < 0.001) when compared to high FTR hospitals. There was also significantly more staffing of low FTR hospitals by hospitalists (85% vs 20%, P < 0.001) and residents (62% vs 40%, P < 0.01). Low FTR hospitals were noted to have more overnight coverage (75% vs 45%, P < 0.001) as well as a dedicated rapid response team (90% vs 60%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Low FTR hospitals had significantly more staffing resources than high FTR hospitals. Although hiring additional staff may be beneficial, there remain significant financial limitations for many hospitals to implement robust staffing models. Thus, our ongoing work seeks to improve rescue and implement effective staffing strategies within these constraints. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of surgery. Volume 270:Issue 1(2019)
- Journal:
- Annals of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 270:Issue 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 270, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 270
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0270-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07
- Subjects:
- failure to rescue -- hospital staffing model -- surgical outcomes
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.annalsofsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002744 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4932
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1044.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14718.xml