Validation of a province-wide commercial food store dataset in a heterogeneous predominantly rural food environment. Issue 11 (16th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Taylor, Nathan GA; Stymest, Jillian; Mah, Catherine L
• Is Part Of: Public health nutrition. Volume 23:Issue 11(2020)
• Page Start: 1889
• Page End: 1895
• Publication Date: 2020-08-16
• Subjects: Food environment, -- Commercial data, -- Secondary data, -- Validation, -- Food retail, -- Store-type, -- Rurality, -- Canada; Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition policy -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 613.2
• DOI: 10.1017/S1368980019004506
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-9800

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Commercially available business (CAB) datasets for food environments have been investigated for error in large urban contexts and some rural areas, but there is a relative dearth of literature that reports error across regions of variable rurality. The objective of the current study was to assess the validity of a CAB dataset using a government dataset at the provincial scale. Design: A ground-truthed dataset provided by the government of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) was used to assess a popular commercial dataset. Concordance, sensitivity, positive-predictive value (PPV) and geocoding errors were calculated. Measures were stratified by store types and rurality to investigate any association between these variables and database accuracy. Setting: NL, Canada. Participants: The current analysis used store-level (ecological) data. Results: Of 1125 stores, there were 380 stores that existed in both datasets and were considered true-positive stores. The mean positional error between a ground-truthed and test point was 17·72 km. When compared with the provincial dataset of businesses, grocery stores had the greatest agreement, sensitivity = 0·64, PPV = 0·60 and concordance = 0·45. Gas stations had the least agreement, sensitivity = 0·26, PPV = 0·32 and concordance = 0·17. Only 4 % of commercial data points in rural areas matched every criterion examined. Conclusions: The commercial dataset exhibits a low level of agreement with the ground-truthed provincial data. Particularly retailers in rural areas or belonging to the gas station category suffered from misclassification and/or geocoding errors. Taken together, the commercial dataset is differentially representative of the ground-truthed reality based on store-type and rurality/urbanity.