COVID-19 and Psychological Disaster Preparedness – An Unmet Need. (25th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Agarwal, Vishwesh; Sharma, Supriya; Gupta, Latika; Misra, Durga Prasanna; Davalbhakta, Samira; Agarwal, Vikas; Goel, Ashish; Aggarwal, Shelley
• Is Part Of: Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. Volume 14:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 387
• Page End: 390
• Publication Date: 2020-06-25
• Subjects: awareness, -- epidemic, -- knowledge, -- psychological preparedness, -- psychology, -- risk; Disaster medicine -- Periodicals; Emergency management -- Planning -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 363.34
• DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.219
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1935-7893

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is a disaster of unprecedented proportions with global repercussions. Psychological preparedness, the primed cognitive awareness and anticipation of dealing with emotional responses in an adverse situation, has assumed a compelling relevance during a health disaster of this magnitude. Methods: An anonymized eSurvey was conducted in India to assess psychological preparedness toward the ongoing pandemic with a focus on knowledge, management of own and others' emotional response, and anticipatory coping mechanisms among the survey population. An adapted version of the qualitative Psychological Preparedness for Natural Disaster Scale validated by the World Health Organization was widely circulated over the Internet and various social media platforms for assessment. Results are expressed as median ± standard deviation. Descriptive statistics were used and figures downloaded from surveymonkey.com. Results: Of the 1120 respondents (M:F 1.7:1, age 35 years ±14.1), most expressed a high level of perceived knowledge and confidence of managing COVID-19, such as awareness of the symptoms of the illness (95.1%), actions needed (94.4%), hospital to report to (88.9%), and emergency contact number (89.1%). A majority (95%) monitored regularly the news bulletins and scientific journals regarding COVID-19. However, nearly one-third (29.2%) could not assess their likelihood of developing COVID-19, and 17.5% were unaware of the difference between a mild and severe infection. Twenty-three percent (23.3%) were unfamiliar with the materials needed in an acute illness situation. Conclusion: Psychological disaster preparedness is reasonable, although lacking in specific domains. Timely but focused interventions can be a cost-efficient administrative exercise, which federal agencies may prioritize working on.