Dual-Task in Large Perceptual Space Reveals Subclinical Hemispatial Neglect. (27th November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Dual-Task in Large Perceptual Space Reveals Subclinical Hemispatial Neglect. (27th November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Dual-Task in Large Perceptual Space Reveals Subclinical Hemispatial Neglect
- Authors:
- Villarreal, Sanna
Linnavuo, Matti
Sepponen, Raimo
Vuori, Outi
Jokinen, Hanna
Hietanen, Marja - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: Both clinically observable and subclinical hemispatial neglect are related to functional disability. The aim of the present study was to examine whether increasing task complexity improves sensitivity in assessment and whether it enables the identification of subclinical neglect. Method: We developed and compared two computerized dual-tasks, a simpler and a more complex one, and presented them on a large, 173 × 277 cm screen. Participants in the study included 40 patients with unilateral stroke in either the left hemisphere (LH patient group, n = 20) or the right hemisphere (RH patient group, n = 20) and 20 healthy controls. In addition to the large-screen tasks, all participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. The Bells Test was used as a traditional paper-and-pencil cancellation test to assess neglect. Results: RH patients made significantly more left hemifield omission errors than controls in both large-screen tasks. LH patients' omissions did not differ significantly from those of the controls in either large-screen task. No significant group differences were observed in the Bells Test. All groups' reaction times were significantly slower in the more complex large-screen task compared to the simpler one. The more complex large-screen task also produced significantly slower reactions to stimuli in the left than in the right hemifield in all groups. Conclusions: The present results suggest that dual-tasks presented on a largeAbstract: Objective: Both clinically observable and subclinical hemispatial neglect are related to functional disability. The aim of the present study was to examine whether increasing task complexity improves sensitivity in assessment and whether it enables the identification of subclinical neglect. Method: We developed and compared two computerized dual-tasks, a simpler and a more complex one, and presented them on a large, 173 × 277 cm screen. Participants in the study included 40 patients with unilateral stroke in either the left hemisphere (LH patient group, n = 20) or the right hemisphere (RH patient group, n = 20) and 20 healthy controls. In addition to the large-screen tasks, all participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. The Bells Test was used as a traditional paper-and-pencil cancellation test to assess neglect. Results: RH patients made significantly more left hemifield omission errors than controls in both large-screen tasks. LH patients' omissions did not differ significantly from those of the controls in either large-screen task. No significant group differences were observed in the Bells Test. All groups' reaction times were significantly slower in the more complex large-screen task compared to the simpler one. The more complex large-screen task also produced significantly slower reactions to stimuli in the left than in the right hemifield in all groups. Conclusions: The present results suggest that dual-tasks presented on a large screen sensitively reveal subclinical neglect in stroke. New, sensitive, and ecologically valid methods are needed to evaluate subclinical neglect. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. Volume 26:Number 10(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Number 10(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 10 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0026-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 993
- Page End:
- 1005
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-27
- Subjects:
- Stroke, -- Unilateral neglect, -- Divided attention, -- Computer-based, -- Neuropsychological assessment, -- Reaction times
Neuropsychology -- Periodicals
616.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=INS ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1017/S1355617720000508 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1355-6177
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 14700.xml