Issues with deprescribing in haemodialysis: a qualitative study of patient and provider experiences. (22nd October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bondurant‐David, Kaitlin; Dang, Sébastien; Levy, Shirel; Sperlea, David; Vanier, Marie‐Claude; Gerardi, Savannah; David, Pierre‐Marie
• Is Part Of: International journal of pharmacy practice. Volume 28:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 635
• Page End: 642
• Publication Date: 2020-10-22
• Subjects: deprescriptions -- patient participation -- polypharmacy -- professional–patient relations -- qualitative research -- renal dialysis; Pharmacy -- Practice -- Periodicals; 615.1
• DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12674
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0961-7671

Abstract

Abstract: Rationale, aims and objectives: Patients undergoing haemodialysis receive on average 10–17 medications, which increase the risk of falls, adverse drug reactions and hospitalizations. Supervised discontinuation of potentially inappropriate medications may lower these risks. Although many calls have been made for deprescribing in the haemodialysis setting, little is known about how patients and providers in this setting experience it. The aim of this study is to explore patient and provider experiences and perceptions of one of the rare deprescribing intervention in haemodialysis. Methods: Ten semi‐structured interviews were held with patients, and a focus group was done with dialysis clinic team members at a Montreal area health network's haemodialysis clinic after the implementation of a standardized deprescribing intervention using the patient‐as‐partner approach. The interviews and focus group were recorded, and verbatims were coded to determine emerging themes. Grounded theory was used for interview guide design and data analysis. Results: The three emerging themes were (1) ambivalence towards medication creating a favourable context for deprescribing, (2) the empowering elements of the deprescribing process and (3) the uncertain future of deprescribing in the clinics even though the intervention was considered successful. Conclusion: Haemodialysis patients and providers viewed deprescribing favourably, believed the intervention was valuable, and offered suggestions for long term implementation while expressing concerns about feasibility. Notwithstanding the underlying uncertainties, a structured and integrated approach in routine practice involving all members of the care team may facilitate the continuity of deprescribing as an intervention in the setting of a haemodialysis clinic.