Critical review of leaflets about conservative management used in uk renal services. Issue 4 (8th April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Winterbottom, Anna E.; Mooney, Andrew; Russon, Lynne; Hipkiss, Vicki; Williams, Richard; Ziegler, Lucy; Bekker, Hilary L.
• Is Part Of: Journal of renal care. Volume 46:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: 250
• Page End: 257
• Publication Date: 2020-04-08
• Subjects: Conservative management -- Decision making -- Patient leaflets -- Pre‐dialysis education -- Shared decision making; Kidneys -- Diseases -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Hemodialysis -- Periodicals; Kidney Diseases -- nursing -- Periodicals; Renal Replacement Therapy -- nursing -- Periodicals; 616.61
• DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12327
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-6678

Abstract

SUMMARY: Background: Written information supplements nurse‐led education about treatment options. It is unclear if this information enhances patients' reasoning about conservative management (CM) and renal replacement therapy decisions. Aim: This study describes a critical review of resources U.K. renal staff use when providing CM options to people with Established Kidney Disease (EKD) during usual pre‐dialysis education. Design: A survey using mixed methods identified and critically analysed leaflets about CM. Participants & measurements: All 72 renal units in the United Kingdom received an 11‐item questionnaire to elicit how CM education is delivered, satisfaction and/or needs with patient resources and staff training. Copies of leaflets were requested. A coding frame was utilised to produce a quality score for each leaflet. Results: Fifty‐four (75%) units participated. Patients discuss CM with a nephrologist (98%) or nurse (100%). Eighteen leaflets were reviewed, mean scores were 8.44 out of 12 (range 5–12, SD = 2.49) for information presentation; 3.50 out of 6 (range 0–6, SD = 1.58) for inclusion of information known to support shared decision‐making and 2.28 out of 6 (range 1–4, SD = 0.96) for presenting non‐biased information. Conclusions: Nurses preferred communicating via face‐to‐face contact with patients and/or families because of the emotional consequences and complexity of planning treatment for the next stage of a person's worsening kidney disease. Conversations were supplemented with written information; 66% of which were produced locally. Staff perceived a need for using leaflets, and spend time and resources developing them to support their services. However, no leaflets included the components needed to help people reason about conservative care and renal replacement therapy options during EKD education consultations.