Cardiovascular Health Trends in Electronic Health Record Data (2012–2015): A Cross-Sectional Analysis of The Guideline Advantage™. Issue 1 (18th July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rudy, Joyce E.; Khan, Yosef; Bower, Julie K.; Patel, Sejal; Foraker, Randi E.
• Is Part Of: EGEMS. Volume 7:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-07-18
• Subjects: public health -- epidemiology -- risk factors -- cardiovascular diseases -- electronic health records; Medical records -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Medical Records; Automatic Data Processing; Medical care -- Data processing; Medical records -- Data processing; Periodicals; Periodicals; 651.504261
• DOI: 10.5334/egems.268
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2327-9214

Abstract

Background: Electronic health record (EHR) data can measure cardiovascular health (CVH) of patient populations, but have limited generalizability when derived from one health care system. Objective: We used The Guideline Advantage™ (TGA) data repository, comprising EHR data of patients from 8 diverse health care systems, to describe CVH of adult patients and progress towards the American Heart Association's (AHA's) 2020 Impact Goals. Methods: Our analysis included 203, 488 patients with 677, 733 encounters recorded in TGA from 2012 to 2015. Five measures from EHRs [cigarette smoking status, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), cholesterol, and diabetes mellitus (DM)] were categorized as poor/intermediate/ideal according to AHA's Life's Simple 7 algorithm. We presented distributions and trends of CVH for each metric over time, first using all available data, and then in a subsample (n = 1, 890) of patients with complete data on all metrics. Results: Among all patients, the greatest stride towards ideal CVH attainment from 2012 to 2015 was for cigarette smoking (50.6 percent to 65 percent), followed by DM (17.3 percent to 20.7 percent) and BP (21.1 percent to 23.2 percent). Overall, prevalence of ideal CVH did not increase for any metric in the subsample. Males slightly improved in ideal CVH for BMI and cholesterol; meanwhile, females saw no improvement in ideal CVH for any metric. As ideal CVH for BP and cholesterol increased slightly among white patients, ideal CVH for BP, cholesterol, BMI, and DM worsened for non-whites. Conclusion: Despite improvements in some CVH metrics in the outpatient setting, more tangible progress is needed to meet AHA's 2020 Impact Goals.