4219 Discrepancies in flavor preferences among adult ever users of various tobacco products in the US – Findings from The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2015-2016). Issue Volume 4:Issue(2020)Supplement 1 (June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 4219 Discrepancies in flavor preferences among adult ever users of various tobacco products in the US – Findings from The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2015-2016). Issue Volume 4:Issue(2020)Supplement 1 (June 2020)
- Main Title:
- 4219 Discrepancies in flavor preferences among adult ever users of various tobacco products in the US – Findings from The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2015-2016)
- Authors:
- Schneller, Liane M
Li, Dongmei
Quiñones-Tavárez, Zahíra
Goniewicz, Maciej
Quisenberry, Amanda
Xie, Zidian
Rahman, Irfan
McIntosh, Scott
O'Connor, Richard
Ossip, Deborah J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Flavorings differ between brands and tobacco products, potentially altering the sensory perceptions. This study aimed to examine discrepancies in flavor preference across various non-cigarette tobacco products among a national representative sample of US adult regular tobacco users. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 3 (W3) were used. Weighted prevalence of flavor preference for various tobacco products, including electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), traditional cigars, cigarillos/filtered cigars, hookah and snus/smokeless, was presented for 9, 037 adult current and new former users of multiple flavored tobacco products. Within-subject flavor discrepancies were assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models considering the complex sampling design of the PATH study. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Most regular users of a flavored tobacco products reported using one flavor category per product. Fruit flavors, followed by tobacco, were the most common flavor categories among ENDS (32% and 25%, respectively) and hookah users (44% and 36%, respectively). Tobacco flavor was the most common among regular users of traditional cigars (80%), cigarillos/filtered cigars (55%), and smokeless tobacco (79%). Polytobacco users of ENDS and traditional cigars had the largest discrepancy, where about 68-76%% used different flavor categories when switching products. Conversely,Abstract : OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Flavorings differ between brands and tobacco products, potentially altering the sensory perceptions. This study aimed to examine discrepancies in flavor preference across various non-cigarette tobacco products among a national representative sample of US adult regular tobacco users. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 3 (W3) were used. Weighted prevalence of flavor preference for various tobacco products, including electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), traditional cigars, cigarillos/filtered cigars, hookah and snus/smokeless, was presented for 9, 037 adult current and new former users of multiple flavored tobacco products. Within-subject flavor discrepancies were assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models considering the complex sampling design of the PATH study. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Most regular users of a flavored tobacco products reported using one flavor category per product. Fruit flavors, followed by tobacco, were the most common flavor categories among ENDS (32% and 25%, respectively) and hookah users (44% and 36%, respectively). Tobacco flavor was the most common among regular users of traditional cigars (80%), cigarillos/filtered cigars (55%), and smokeless tobacco (79%). Polytobacco users of ENDS and traditional cigars had the largest discrepancy, where about 68-76%% used different flavor categories when switching products. Conversely, polytobacco users of traditional cigars and cigarillos/filtered cigars had the lowest discrepancy (23-25%). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Many consumers of multiple tobacco products had different flavor preferences when switching between products. In the event of a partial or full flavor ban for ENDS, these findings raise questions about consumer loyalty to a particular tobacco product or a particular flavor category. Conflict of Interest Description: MLG serves as a paid consultant for Johnson & Johnson and has received research grant from Pfizer, manufacturers of smoking cessation medications. The other authors have no conflicts to declare. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESCRIPTION: MLG serves as a paid consultant for Johnson & Johnson and has received research grant from Pfizer, manufacturers of smoking cessation medications. The other authors have no conflicts to declare. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical and translational science. Volume 4:Issue(2020)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical and translational science
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Issue(2020)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0004-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 47
- Page End:
- 48
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06
- Subjects:
- Clinical medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
Medicine, Experimental -- Periodicals
Human experimentation in medicine -- Periodicals
616.027 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-clinical-and-translational-science ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1017/cts.2020.175 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2059-8661
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 14682.xml