Group & save sampling in lumbar decompression: A review into current practice. Issue 1 (January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McKenna, M; Abdelaal, A
• Is Part Of: Journal of perioperative practice. Volume 31:Issue 1/2(2021)
• Page Start: 15
• Page End: 17
• Publication Date: 2021-01
• Subjects: Spine -- Lumbar decompression -- Spinal surgery -- Transfusion -- Cost analyses -- Blood transfusion; Operating room nursing -- Periodicals; 617.9192
• DOI: 10.1177/1750458920950664
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2515-7949

Abstract

The risks, benefits and technical aspects of surgery require careful consideration. One element of this is the requirement of postoperative blood transfusion. Patients who undergo elective lumbar decompression are at a low risk of requiring a postoperative transfusion yet undergo multiple preoperative group & save tests. For those who are at a low risk of bleeding, a single group & save sample may be adequate. This review analysed the postoperative blood loss and transfusion rate associated with lumbar decompression surgery without fusion in one institution. A subsequent cost analysis and review of the literature was performed. The aim was to assess whether single group & save sampling, within the context of lumbar decompression, was cost effective and amenable to the patient without impacting patient care. Average blood loss was estimated as a drop in Hb of 12.3g/dl. Six patients (14%) had Hb loss of over 20g/dl. No patients underwent a blood transfusion. Through examination of medical records, we found that 65% of patients (35) were suitable for single group & save sampling, estimating a saving of £2415.95 (53%). Selective group & save testing holds economic potential and safeguards patients from undergoing unnecessary testing. The next step after this review would be a prospective multi-centre study.