Brain responses to syntax constrained by time-driven implicit prosodic phrases. (August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schremm, Andrea; Horne, Merle; Roll, Mikael
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurolinguistics. Volume 35(2015)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 84
• Publication Date: 2015-08
• Subjects: Event-related potentials -- Syntax -- Working memory -- Scrambling negativity -- Prosodic phrase -- Implicit prosody; Neurolinguistics -- Periodicals; Language and languages -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Psycholinguistics -- Periodicals; Brain -- physiology -- Periodicals; Language -- physiology -- Periodicals; Neurolinguistique -- Périodiques; Langage et langues -- Aspect physiologique -- Périodiques; Psycholinguistique -- Périodiques; Language and languages -- Physiological aspects; Neurolinguistics; Psycholinguistics; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.855
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.03.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0911-6044

Abstract

Abstract: Previous research suggests that time-based working memory limits of 2–3 s constrain the integration of verbal information, and that speakers tend to parse sentences into prosodic phrases that do not extend beyond this time window. The present study used Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to investigate how time-driven implicit prosodic phrasing influences the syntactic processing of embedded clauses. Participants read Swedish sentences in which the first embedded clause had a subordinate, main or neutral clause structure cued by the position of the sentence adverb. The presentation rate was manipulated so that either one or two clauses were read within 2.7 s. When the 2.7 s time limit was reached before the onset of the embedded clause, the sentence adverb indicating subordinate clause structure elicited a posterior negativity and a late positivity. These effects were interpreted to reflect the detection of unexpected word order, followed by the revision of the anticipated main clause structure. A positive shift that correlated with individual working memory span was also seen at the clause-final word after 2.7 s, possibly indicating closure of an implicit prosodic phrase. These results suggest that prosodic phrasing was influenced by time-based working memory limits, which in turn affected syntactic analysis: readers were more likely to interpret an embedded clause as a main clause if it could be associated with the beginning of a new prosodic phrase. Highlights: Brain potentials indicate time constraints on syntactic parsing during reading. We hypothesize that time-driven implicit prosodic phrases affected parsing. Enhanced positivity suggested closure of implicit prosodic phrases at around 2.7 s. Implicit prosodic phrasing made subordinate or main clause structure more expected. Unexpected clause structure elicited an early posterior negativity.