Comparative Study on Dynamic Mechanical Properties and Energy Dissipation of Rocks under Impact Loads. (10th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Renshu; Li, Weiyu; Yue, Zhongwen
• Other Names: Kontoni Denise-Penelope Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Shock and vibration. Volume 2020(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-10
• Subjects: Shock (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Vibration -- Periodicals; 534.5
• DOI: 10.1155/2020/8865099
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1070-9622

Abstract

Abstract : Geological conditions are often complex during rock engineering construction (such as blasting and drilling) and usually involve rocks of several or multiple lithologies. However, comparative studies on the dynamic mechanical response of rocks of different lithologies are relatively few. To study differences in dynamic mechanical properties and energy dissipation of rocks of different lithologies, three kinds of rock that are common in rock engineering and have large differences in wave impedance were selected: red sandstone, gray sandstone, and granite. Samples of these three rocks were subjected to impact compression tests at different impact speeds, and the rock fragments after impact compression were screened to quantify the degree of fragmentation. The characteristics of stress wave propagation, dynamic stress-strain relationships, degree of fragmentation, and energy dissipation laws of the three rock types were compared and studied. The results show the following: (1) affected by the wave impedance matching relationship, the reflected waves, strain rates, and reflected energy of the three kinds of rock showed significant differences under the same incident stress wave. (2) The dynamic mechanical characteristics and energy dissipation laws of the rocks all had obvious strain rate effects, but the dynamic uniaxial compressive strength and energy dissipation density of the three rock types had different sensitivities to the strain rate. (3) The change trend of the energy utilization efficiency of the gray sandstone with incident energy was different from that of the red sandstone and granite; there was no obvious extreme point in the incident energy range. The three kinds of rock required different incident energies to reach maximum energy utilization efficiency. (4) The equivalent average fragment size of the three rock types decreased as a function of power with increasing impact velocity and energy dissipation density. (5) Under the same incident wave, although the reflection energy, transmission energy, and degree of fragmentation of the three kinds of rock showed significant differences, the differences in dissipation energy were small.