Can the Paris Agreement Help Climate Change Litigation and Vice Versa?. Issue 1 (31st March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wegener, Lennart
• Is Part Of: Transnational environmental law. Volume 9:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 17
• Page End: 36
• Publication Date: 2020-03-31
• Subjects: Climate change litigation, -- Paris Agreement, -- Urgenda case, -- National courts; Environmental law, International -- Periodicals; 344.046
• DOI: 10.1017/S2047102519000396
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-1025

Abstract

Abstract: Domestic climate change litigation is prospering across the globe to the extent of becoming a transnational phenomenon of growing importance. At the international level the Paris Agreement, although still in its infancy, has been established as the core element of the climate change governance framework. This article explores the still opaque relationship between domestic climate change litigation and the Paris Agreement. It is argued that dynamic interaction between domestic litigation and the Paris Agreement may improve the overall efficacy of both regimes. On the one hand, an examination of the Paris Agreement's architecture and provisions reveals pathways that are already being used or can be explored further in litigation. On the other hand, litigation can assist and complement the Paris Agreement with regard to its implementation and progress towards its overall goals. The result may deliver more than a multi-level perspective on climate change law. As it captures the law in action on different levels, the proposed 'cross-level' approach has due regard to the implications of the mutual supportiveness or complementarity of legal tools. It also thereby responds to the concern of whether the law can be of significant benefit in addressing complex global issues like climate change.