Distance and percentage distance from median BMI as alternatives to BMI z score. Issue 5 (23rd August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Freedman, David S.; Woo, Jessica G.; Ogden, Cynthia L.; Xu, Ji H.; Cole, Tim J.
• Is Part Of: British journal of nutrition. Volume 124:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 493
• Page End: 500
• Publication Date: 2019-08-23
• Subjects: BMI, -- Children, -- Metrics, -- Obesity; Nutrition -- Periodicals; 572.4
• DOI: 10.1017/S0007114519002046
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1145

Abstract

Abstract: BMI z (BMIz) score based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts is widely used, but it is inaccurate above the 97th percentile. We explored the performance of alternative metrics based on the absolute distance or % distance of a child's BMI from the median BMI for sex and age. We used longitudinal data from 5628 children who were first examined <12 years to compare the tracking of three BMI metrics: distance from median, % distance from median and % distance from median on a log scale. We also explored the effects of adjusting these metrics for age differences in the distribution of BMI. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare tracking of the metrics. Metrics based on % distance (whether on the original or log scale) yielded higher ICCs compared with distance from median. The ICCs of the age-adjusted metrics were higher than that of the unadjusted metrics, particularly among children who were (1) overweight or had obesity, (2) younger and (3) followed for >3 years. The ICCs of the age-adjusted metrics were also higher compared with that of BMIz among children who were overweight or obese. Unlike BMIz, these alternative metrics do not have an upper limit and can be used for assessing BMI in all children, even those with very high BMIs. The age-adjusted % from median (on a log or linear scale) works well for all ages, while unadjusted % from median is better limited to older children or short follow-up periods.