Comparison between mirror Langmuir probe and gas-puff imaging measurements of intermittent fluctuations in the Alcator C-Mod scrape-off layer. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kube, R.; Theodorsen, A.; Garcia, O. E.; Brunner, D.; LaBombard, B.; Terry, J. L.
• Is Part Of: Journal of plasma physics. Volume 86:Number 5(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: fusion plasma, -- plasma diagnostics; Plasma (Ionized gases) -- Periodicals; 530.4405
• DOI: 10.1017/S0022377820001282
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3778

Abstract

Abstract : Statistical properties of the scrape-off layer plasma fluctuations are studied in ohmically heated plasmas in the Alcator C-Mod tokamak. For the first time, plasma fluctuations as well as parameters that describe the fluctuations are compared across measurements from a mirror Langmuir probe (MLP) and from gas-puff imaging (GPI) that sample the same plasma discharge. This comparison is complemented by an analysis of line emission time-series data, synthesized from the MLP electron density and temperature measurements. The fluctuations observed by the MLP and GPI typically display relative fluctuation amplitudes of order unity together with positively skewed and flattened probability density functions. Such data time series are well described by an established stochastic framework that models the data as a superposition of uncorrelated, two-sided exponential pulses. The most important parameter of the process is the intermittency parameter, $\gamma = {\tau _{d}} / {\tau _{w}}$, where ${\tau _{d}}$ denotes the duration time of a single pulse and ${\tau _{w}}$ gives the average waiting time between consecutive pulses. Here we show, using a new deconvolution method, that these parameters can be consistently estimated from different statistics of the data. We also show that the statistical properties of the data sampled by the MLP and GPI diagnostic are very similar. Finally, a synthetic GPI signal using only plasma parameters sampled by the MLP shows qualitatively different fluctuation statistics from the measured GPI signal.