Robust Distance Measures for kNN Classification of Cancer Data. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ehsani, Rezvan; Drabløs, Finn
• Is Part Of: Cancer informatics. Volume 19(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: k-nearest neighbors -- kNN -- distance measures -- Fisher -- Sobolev; Bioinformatics -- Periodicals; Biology -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Research -- Periodicals; Computational biology -- Periodicals; 570.285
• DOI: 10.1177/1176935120965542
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1176-9351

Abstract

The k -Nearest Neighbor ( k NN) classifier represents a simple and very general approach to classification. Still, the performance of k NN classifiers can often compete with more complex machine-learning algorithms. The core of k NN depends on a "guilt by association" principle where classification is performed by measuring the similarity between a query and a set of training patterns, often computed as distances. The relative performance of k NN classifiers is closely linked to the choice of distance or similarity measure, and it is therefore relevant to investigate the effect of using different distance measures when comparing biomedical data. In this study on classification of cancer data sets, we have used both common and novel distance measures, including the novel distance measures Sobolev and Fisher, and we have evaluated the performance of k NN with these distances on 4 cancer data sets of different type. We find that the performance when using the novel distance measures is comparable to the performance with more well-established measures, in particular for the Sobolev distance. We define a robust ranking of all the distance measures according to overall performance. Several distance measures show robust performance in k NN over several data sets, in particular the Hassanat, Sobolev, and Manhattan measures. Some of the other measures show good performance on selected data sets but seem to be more sensitive to the nature of the classification data. It is therefore important to benchmark distance measures on similar data prior to classification to identify the most suitable measure in each case.