Evaluation of direct PCR for routine DNA profiling of non-decomposed deceased individuals. Issue 6 (November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reid, Kate Megan; Heathfield, Laura Jane
• Is Part Of: Science & justice. Volume 60:Issue 6(2020)
• Page Start: 567
• Page End: 572
• Publication Date: 2020-11
• Subjects: Human identification -- DNA profiling -- Direct PCR -- Post-mortem interval -- Low copy number DNA -- Buccal swabs; Forensic sciences -- Periodicals; Criminal investigation -- Periodicals; Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals; Jurisprudence -- Periodicals; Criminalistique -- Périodiques; Enquêtes criminelles -- Périodiques; Criminal investigation; Forensic sciences; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 363.2505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2020.08.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-0306

Abstract

Highlights: For the first time, direct PCR of buccal lysates was explored in a post-mortem setting. 79% of samples yielded full DNA profiles, and failure was attributed to low DNA yield. A full DNA profile was obtained from a decedent who was stored for 887 days. DNA profile success was not associated with duration of body storage. Abstract: Forensic DNA profiling is a standard method used in the attempt to identify deceased individuals. In routine investigations, and if available, the preferred sample type is usually blood. However, this requires the invasive re-opening of the body, days or weeks after the autopsy, which is undesirable in resource-constrained mortuary settings. Motivated by the ease of sampling as well as reduced health and safety risks, this study aimed to establish the success rate of generating a full DNA profile on first attempt from buccal swab lysates using a direct PCR approach. Buccal swab samples were collected from 100 unidentified deceased males, and were subjected to direct DNA profiling with use of the Promega PowerPlex® Y23 Kit. At the time of sample collection, these individuals had been stored for between 1 and 887 days. This study shows that full DNA profiles were initially obtained from 73% of samples, which constitutes the first empirical data pertaining to first time success rates of direct PCR from post-mortem buccal lysates. Further investigation of partial and failed DNA profiles using real-time PCR showed that samples did not contain PCR inhibitors, DNA was not degraded, but DNA concentration was particularly low. Repeating DNA profiling with increased lysate input and extra PCR cycles yielded an additional six full DNA profiles, resulting in an overall success rate of 79%. Overall, DNA profile success rate was not associated with the duration of storage (p = 0.387). Lastly, massively parallel sequencing with the ForenSeq™ Signature DNA Prep kit provided more informative profiles for three additional samples. These results indicate that blood should therefore remain the sample of choice in a post-mortem setting, yet buccal lysates hold potential to be optimised further, which may ease the human identification workflow.