Selective concentrations for trimethoprim resistance in aquatic environments. (November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kraupner, Nadine; Ebmeyer, Stefan; Hutinel, Marion; Fick, Jerker; Flach, Carl-Fredrik; Larsson, D.G. Joakim
• Is Part Of: Environment international. Volume 144(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-11
• Subjects: Antibiotic resistance -- NOEC -- LOEC -- Environmental emission limits; ARG Antibiotic resistance gene -- dfr Trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase -- folA dihydrofolate reductase -- EUCAST The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing -- LOEC Lowest effect concentration -- MIC Minimal inhibitory concentration -- MSC Minimal selective concentration -- NOEC No effect concentration -- OGLM Overdispersed poisson linear model -- OTU Operational Taxonomic Unit -- WWTP Wastewater treatment plant -- PNEC Predicted No Effect Concentration -- ZOTU Zero-radius Operational Taxonomic Unit; Environmental protection -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental Monitoring -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Protection -- Périodiques; Hygiène du milieu -- Périodiques; Environnement -- Surveillance -- Périodiques; Environmental health; Environmental monitoring; Environmental protection; Periodicals; 333.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106083
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-4120

Abstract

Highlights: Trimethoprim selects for resistant E. coli at 100 µg/L in complex communities. Fitness cost of dfr -genes was reduced at 10 µg/L in pairwise competition assays. Fitness costs are highly dependent on genetic and environmental contexts. Thus, a reduction in cost is considered a risk, even if some cost still remains. Keeping exposure of trimethoprim <1 µg/L will limit risks for resistance selection. Abstract: Antibiotic resistance presents a serious and still growing threat to human health. Environmental exposure levels required to select for resistance are unknown for most antibiotics. Here, we evaluated different experimental approaches and ways to interpret effect measures, in order to identify what concentration of trimethoprim that are likely to select for resistance in aquatic environments. When grown in complex biofilms, selection for resistant E. coli increased at 100 µg/L, whereas there was only a non-significant trend with regards to changes in taxonomic composition within the tested range (0–100 µg/L). Planktonic co-culturing of 149 different E. coli strains isolated from sewage again confirmed selection at 100 µg/L. Finally, pairwise competition experiments were performed with engineered E. coli strains carrying different trimethoprim resistance genes ( dfr ) and their sensitive counterparts. While strains with introduced resistance genes grew slower than the sensitive ones at 0 and 10 µg/L, a significant reduction in cost was found already at 10 µg/L. Defining lowest effect concentrations by comparing proportion of resistant strains to sensitive ones at the same time point, rather than to their initial ratios, will reflect the advantage a resistance factor can bring, while ignoring exposure-independent fitness costs. As costs are likely to be highly dependent on the specific environmental and genetic contexts, the former approach might be more suitable as a basis for defining exposure limits with the intention to prevent selection for resistance. Based on the present and other studies, we propose that 1 µg/L would be a reasonably protective exposure limit for trimethoprim in aquatic environments.