Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in staff working across different care homes: enhanced CoVID-19 outbreak investigations in London care Homes. Issue 4 (October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in staff working across different care homes: enhanced CoVID-19 outbreak investigations in London care Homes. Issue 4 (October 2020)
- Main Title:
- Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in staff working across different care homes: enhanced CoVID-19 outbreak investigations in London care Homes
- Authors:
- Ladhani, Shamez N
Chow, J. Yimmy
Janarthanan, Roshni
Fok, Jonathan
Crawley-Boevey, Emma
Vusirikala, Amoolya
Fernandez, Elena
Perez, Marina Sanchez
Tang, Suzanne
Dun-Campbell, Kate
Wynne-Evans, Edward
Bell, Anita
Patel, Bharat
Amin-Chowdhury, Zahin
Aiano, Felicity
Paranthaman, Karthik
Ma, Thomas
Saavedra-Campos, Maria
Myers, Richard
Ellis, Joanna
Lackenby, Angie
Gopal, Robin
Patel, Monika
Chand, Meera
Brown, Kevin
Hopkins, Susan
Consortium, CoG
Shetty, Nandini
Zambon, Maria
Ramsay, Mary E - Abstract:
- Highlights: 21% of 255 staff working in 6 care homes with a COVID-19 outbreak were SARS-CoV-2 positive. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was similar in staff with regular (18%), occasional (16%) or no (15%) resident contact. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was 3-fold higher in staff working across different care homes. Whole genome sequencing identified distinct clusters involving staff only. Summary: Background: Care homes have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to suffer large outbreaks even when community infection rates are declining, thus representing important pockets of transmission. We assessed occupational risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection among staff in six care homes experiencing a COVID-19 outbreak during the peak of the pandemic in London, England. Methods: Care home staff were tested for SARS-COV-2 infection by RT-PCR and asked to report any symptoms, their contact with residents and if they worked in different care homes. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on RT-PCR positive samples. Results: In total, 53 (21%) of 254 staff were SARS-CoV-2 positive but only 12/53 (23%) were symptomatic. Among staff working in a single care home, SARS-CoV-2 positivity was 15% (2/13), 16% (7/45) and 18% (30/169) in those reporting no, occasional and regular contact with residents. In contrast, staff working across different care homes (14/27, 52%) had a 3.0-fold (95% CI, 1.9–4.8; P <0.001) higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 positivity than staff working inHighlights: 21% of 255 staff working in 6 care homes with a COVID-19 outbreak were SARS-CoV-2 positive. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was similar in staff with regular (18%), occasional (16%) or no (15%) resident contact. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was 3-fold higher in staff working across different care homes. Whole genome sequencing identified distinct clusters involving staff only. Summary: Background: Care homes have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to suffer large outbreaks even when community infection rates are declining, thus representing important pockets of transmission. We assessed occupational risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection among staff in six care homes experiencing a COVID-19 outbreak during the peak of the pandemic in London, England. Methods: Care home staff were tested for SARS-COV-2 infection by RT-PCR and asked to report any symptoms, their contact with residents and if they worked in different care homes. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on RT-PCR positive samples. Results: In total, 53 (21%) of 254 staff were SARS-CoV-2 positive but only 12/53 (23%) were symptomatic. Among staff working in a single care home, SARS-CoV-2 positivity was 15% (2/13), 16% (7/45) and 18% (30/169) in those reporting no, occasional and regular contact with residents. In contrast, staff working across different care homes (14/27, 52%) had a 3.0-fold (95% CI, 1.9–4.8; P <0.001) higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 positivity than staff working in single care homes (39/227, 17%). WGS identified SARS-CoV-2 clusters involving staff only, including some that included staff working across different care homes. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 positivity was significantly higher among staff working across different care homes than those who were working in the same care home. We found local clusters of SARS-CoV-2 infection between staff only, including those with minimal resident contact. Infection control should be extended for all contact, including those between staff, whilst on care home premises. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of infection. Volume 81:Issue 4(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of infection
- Issue:
- Volume 81:Issue 4(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 81, Issue 4 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 81
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0081-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 621
- Page End:
- 624
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10
- Subjects:
- SARS-CoV-2 -- COVID-19 -- Care homes -- Occupational risk -- Transmission
Infection -- Periodicals
Bacterial Infections -- Periodicals
Communicable Diseases -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.idealibrary.com/links/toc/jinf/ ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01634453 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01634453 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01634453 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.07.027 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0163-4453
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5006.690000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14597.xml