Spatial replication and habitat context matters for assessments of tropical biodiversity using acoustic indices. (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mitchell, Simon L.; Bicknell, Jake E.; Edwards, David P.; Deere, Nicolas J.; Bernard, Henry; Davies, Zoe G.; Struebig, Matthew J.
• Is Part Of: Ecological indicators. Volume 119(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Bioacoustics -- Soundscape -- Acoustic index -- Biodiversity -- Birds -- Spatial replication, LiDAR; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environmental impact analysis -- Periodicals; Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; 333.71405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106717
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1470-160X

Abstract

Highlights: Acoustic indices reflect biodiversity in tropical forests in Borneo. For indices to reflect patterns of biodiversity requires sufficient spatial sampling. Acoustic indices in tropical forests also change in association with changes in forest structure. Relationships between species richness and acoustic indices vary by habitat context. Acoustic indices exhibit no relationship with species richness in commercial oil palm estates. Abstract: Approaches to characterise and monitor biodiversity based on the sound signals of ecosystems have become popular in landscape ecology and biodiversity conservation. However, to date, validation studies of how well acoustic indices reflect observed biodiversity patterns have often relied on low levels of either spatial or temporal replication, while focussing on habitats with similar underlying anthropological and geophysical sound characteristics. For acoustic indices to be broadly applicable to biodiversity monitoring, their capacity to measure the ecological facets of soundscapes must be robust to these potential sources of bias. Using two contrasting recording approaches, we examined the efficacy of four commonly used acoustic indices to reflect patterns of observed bird species richness across a tropical forest degradation gradient in Northeast Borneo. The gradient comprised intact and logged forests, riparian forests, remnants, and oil palm plantations, thus providing a highly variable anthrophonic and geophonic soundscape. We compared the degree to which acoustic indices derived from automated versus point count recording methods detected variation in inter-habitat species richness, as well as their capacity to capture changes in species diversity as a consequence of forest degradation quantified by high-resolution LiDAR derived forest canopy heights. We found Acoustic Diversity Index was associated with forest canopy height as measured by both automated recorders and recordings from point counts, whereas the association between canopy height and Acoustic Complexity Index was only detected using point count recordings. For both types of recordings, Acoustic Complexity Index exhibited the strongest relationship with observed bird richness in old growth and logged forest, whereas Acoustic Diversity was not linked, suggesting avian richness does not drive its association with canopy height. No acoustic indices were associated with observed bird richness in oil palm riparian areas. Our findings underscore the potential utility of soundscape approaches to characterise biodiversity patterns in degraded tropical landscapes, and may be used as a proxy for human inventories of bird communities. However, we also show that for acoustic indices to be effective on landscape-wide studies of environmental gradients, adequate spatial replication is required, and care must be taken to control for non-target elements of soundscapes in different habitats.