Integration of the WUDAPT, WRF, and ENVI-met models to simulate extreme daytime temperature mitigation strategies in San Jose, California. (15th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McRae, Ian; Freedman, Frank; Rivera, Ana; Li, Xinwei; Dou, Jingjing; Cruz, Isa; Ren, Chao; Dronova, Iryna; Fraker, Harrison; Bornstein, Robert
• Is Part Of: Building and environment. Volume 184(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-15
• Subjects: WUDAPT -- Urbanized WRF -- ENVI-met -- Urban heat islands -- Urban planning -- Thermal mitigation strategies; Buildings -- Environmental engineering -- Periodicals; Building -- Research -- Periodicals; Constructions -- Technique de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 696
• DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107180
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-1323

Abstract

Abstract: An obstacle to the modeling of strategies to mitigate extreme urban temperatures is frequently the lack of on-site meteorological data. The current study thus reports on a method that used the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to generate inputs for the ENVI-met model to produce building-scale canyon temperatures within a 300 m square near downtown San Jose. A land use distribution was generated for WRF by a WUDAPT classification, and the days of interest were then the hottest day in California history and a typical summer day. The source of meteorological data for ENVI-met, run with a 1.5 m cubic grid, was either an urbanized version of WRF; its default version; or observations at the closest NWS site. All WRF simulations were run on a 1 km grid, and output at its grid closest to the study area provided ENVI-met with lateral boundary conditions. The mitigation strategy was comprised of three parts, which either increased vegetation, rooftop albedo, or architectural shade elements. Results showed all strategies with only negligible impacts on ENVI-met nighttime 1 m level street canyon temperatures. Increased vegetation, however, was the most effective daytime strategy on both days, as it affected the largest area. The maximum vegetative cooling on the extreme and average days was −3.5 and −3.3 °C, respectively. While increased rooftop albedos produced near negligible impacts, increased architectural shading produced corresponding values of −1.6 and −1.7 °C, respectively. Highlights: Urban WRF generally reproduced meteorological conditions better than default WRF. WUDAPT Level-0 urban LCZ classification yielded an overall test accuracy of 62%. Vegetation was the most effective urban canyon daytime thermal mitigation strategy. Daytime canyon warming resulted from the increased albedo and shading strategies.