A theoretical and empirical assessment of stomatal optimization modeling. Issue 2 (8th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Yujie; Sperry, John S.; Anderegg, William R. L.; Venturas, Martin D.; Trugman, Anna T.
• Is Part Of: New phytologist. Volume 227:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 311
• Page End: 325
• Publication Date: 2020-05-08
• Subjects: carbon gain -- gas exchange -- hydraulics -- optimization model -- stomatal control -- trade‐off -- water penalty; Botany -- Periodicals; 580
• DOI: 10.1111/nph.16572
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-646X

Abstract

Summary: Optimal stomatal control models have shown great potential in predicting stomatal behavior and improving carbon cycle modeling. Basic stomatal optimality theory posits that stomatal regulation maximizes the carbon gain relative to a penalty of stomatal opening. All models take a similar approach to calculate instantaneous carbon gain from stomatal opening (the gain function). Where the models diverge is in how they calculate the corresponding penalty (the penalty function). In this review, we compare and evaluate 10 different optimization models in how they quantify the penalty and how well they predict stomatal responses to the environment. We evaluate models in two ways. First, we compare their penalty functions against seven criteria that ensure a unique and qualitatively realistic solution. Second, we quantitatively test model against multiple leaf gas‐exchange datasets. The optimization models with better predictive skills have penalty functions that meet our seven criteria and use fitting parameters that are both few in number and physiology based. The most skilled models are those with a penalty function based on stress‐induced hydraulic failure. We conclude by proposing a new model that has a hydraulics‐based penalty function that meets all seven criteria and demonstrates a highly predictive skill against our test datasets.