State of Children Environmental Health Research in Latin America. Issue 2 (27th July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: López-Carrillo, Lizbeth; González-González, Leonel; Piña-Pozas, Maricela; Mérida-Ortega, Ángel; Gamboa-Loira, Brenda; Blanco-Muñoz, Julia; Torres-Sánchez, Luisa E.; Hurtado-Díaz, Magali; Cortez-Lugo, Marlene; Guerra, Germán; de Snyder, Nelly Salgado; Cebrian, Mariano E.
• Is Part Of: Annals of global health. Volume 84:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 204
• Page End: 211
• Publication Date: 2018-07-27
• Subjects: 362.1
• DOI: 10.29024/aogh.908
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2214-9996

Abstract

Background: Promotion of biomedical research along with the development of evidence-based prevention policies have been suggested as an effective way to reduce environmental risks for children's health in Latin America. However, there is little information on the current state of childhood environmental health research, which might help identify its strengths and limitations, as well as to design a strategy to improve the future of child environmental health research in the region. Objective: To describe the current state of environmental health research on children exposed to environmental pollutants in Latin America. Methodology: We performed a comprehensive search of published peer-reviewed environmental health articles (1994–2014), dealing with the exposure of Latin American children to chemical compounds. We described the type of studies and their research topics, and identified networks of co-authors. We also analyzed the relationship between research funding sources and the impact factor (IF) of the journal where research was published. Results: The average number of publications was about 20 per year. Mexico and Brazil produced almost 70% of the 409 identified papers. The most studied contaminant was lead, but research on this element has declined since 2005. Retrospective studies were the most frequent, and also showed a decreasing trend. Most studies did not assess health effects. Four groups of leading investigators and two collaboration models for scientific production were identified. Except for Mexico, there was very little collaboration with North American and European countries. Compared to articles that did not report financial support, those that received international funding had on average an IF around 7, and those with national funding reached a mean IF near 3. Conclusion: There is a limited number of publications and insufficient collaboration between Latin-American scientists. It is necessary to identify strategies to stimulate South-South-North alliances and strengthen the scarce research on the environmental health of children in the region.