Validation of a 15‐item Care‐related Regret Coping Scale for Health‐care Professionals (RCS‐HCP). Issue 6 (19th January 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Validation of a 15‐item Care‐related Regret Coping Scale for Health‐care Professionals (RCS‐HCP). Issue 6 (19th January 2015)
- Main Title:
- Validation of a 15‐item Care‐related Regret Coping Scale for Health‐care Professionals (RCS‐HCP)
- Authors:
- Courvoisier, Delphine Sophie
Cullati, Stephane
Ouchi, Rieko
Schmidt, Ralph Eric
Haller, Guy
Chopard, Pierre
Agoritsas, Thomas
Perneger, Thomas V. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Validation of a 15‐item Care‐related Regret Coping Scale for Health‐care Professionals (RCS‐HCP): Delphine Sophie COURVOISIER, et al . Department of Psychology, Harvard University, USA— Objectives: Coping with difficult care‐related situations is a common challenge for health‐care professionals. How these professionals deal with the regrets they may experience following one of the many decisions and interventions they must make every day can have an impact on their own health and quality of life, and also on their patient care practices. To identify professionals most at need for extra support, development and validation of a tool measuring coping style are needed. Methods: We performed a survey of physicians and nurses of a French‐speaking University hospital; 469 healthcare professionals responded to the survey, and 175 responded to the same survey one‐month later. Regret was assessed with the regret coping scale developed for this study, self‐report questions on the frequency of regretted situations and the intensity of regret. Construct validity was assessed using measures of health‐care professionals' quality of life (including job and life satisfaction, and self‐reported health) as well as sleep problems and depression. Results: Based on factor analysis and item response analysis, the initial 31‐item scale was shortened to 15 items, which measured three types of strategies: problem‐focused strategies (i.e., trying to find solutions, talking to colleagues)Abstract : Validation of a 15‐item Care‐related Regret Coping Scale for Health‐care Professionals (RCS‐HCP): Delphine Sophie COURVOISIER, et al . Department of Psychology, Harvard University, USA— Objectives: Coping with difficult care‐related situations is a common challenge for health‐care professionals. How these professionals deal with the regrets they may experience following one of the many decisions and interventions they must make every day can have an impact on their own health and quality of life, and also on their patient care practices. To identify professionals most at need for extra support, development and validation of a tool measuring coping style are needed. Methods: We performed a survey of physicians and nurses of a French‐speaking University hospital; 469 healthcare professionals responded to the survey, and 175 responded to the same survey one‐month later. Regret was assessed with the regret coping scale developed for this study, self‐report questions on the frequency of regretted situations and the intensity of regret. Construct validity was assessed using measures of health‐care professionals' quality of life (including job and life satisfaction, and self‐reported health) as well as sleep problems and depression. Results: Based on factor analysis and item response analysis, the initial 31‐item scale was shortened to 15 items, which measured three types of strategies: problem‐focused strategies (i.e., trying to find solutions, talking to colleagues) and two types of emotion‐focused strategies, A (i.e., self‐blame, rumination) and B (e.g., acceptance, emotional distance). All subscales showed high internal consistency (α>0.85). Overall, as expected, problem‐focused and emotion‐focused B strategies correlated with higher quality of life, fewer sleep problems and less depression, and emotion‐focused A strategies showed the opposite pattern. Conclusions: The regret coping scale (RCS‐HCP) is a valid and reliable measure of coping abilities of hospital‐based health‐care professionals. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of occupational health. Volume 56:Issue 6(2014)
- Journal:
- Journal of occupational health
- Issue:
- Volume 56:Issue 6(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 56, Issue 6 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0056-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 430
- Page End:
- 443
- Publication Date:
- 2015-01-19
- Subjects:
- Coping -- Health‐care professionals -- Hospital setting
Medicine, Industrial -- Periodicals
Industrial hygiene -- Periodicals
Medicine, Industrial
Occupational Diseases
Occupational Exposure
Occupational Health
Occupational Medicine
Periodicals
Periodical
Electronic journals
613.62 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/joh ↗
http://www.bibliothek.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/?2075956 ↗
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13489585 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1539/joh.14-0060-OA ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1341-9145
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14585.xml